Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$403kYouth Development$370kHealth$82kArts & Culture$65kAnimals$39kEducation$25kRecreation & Sports$19k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND$20,000
APPLEWOOD CENTERS INC$18,000
SALVATION ARMY$17,000
CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN$12,000
RAINEY INSTITUTE$10,000
HATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION$10,000
ROLLINBUCKEYEZ FOUNDATION$7,500
ACHIEVEMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN (CAMP CHEERFUL)$7,500
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$6,408
CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$5,625
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF GREATER CLEVELAND (UCP)$5,500
FAMILY CONNECTIONS$5,250
CLEVELAND HEARING & SPEECH CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HIRAM HOUSE CAMP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $3k → 13%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $20k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $17k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $17k → 6%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $17k → 6%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $12k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $5k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ROSEMARY CENTER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 25 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

$1.2M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-32%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +17%
  • AC
    APPLEWOOD CENTERS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $144k · revenue +35%
  • EB
    ELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $75k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • BH
    BLESSING HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Christian Home Inc

The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.

Religion
2
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
3
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
4
OhioGuidestone

To provide pathways for growth, achievement, and lifelong success.

Health
5
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
6
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
7
Catholic Charities Corporation

Respond to those in need through an integrated system of quality services designed to respect the dignity of every person and build a just and compassionate society.

Human Services
8
Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…

Health
9
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Providing essential services that remove barriers, strengthens families, and promotes healing when children need healthcare.

Human Services
10
Circle Health Services

Circle Health fights for equity by healing, teaching, and inspiring individuals and families to reach their full potential.

—
11
Columbus Early Learning Centers

Columbus early learning centers (celc) has over 130 years of history providing high quality, affordable early learning and childcare in central ohio. this rich history places celc amongst the oldest early childcare programs in the country.…

—
12
United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Cleveland Inc

The mission of united cerebral palsy is to empower children and adults with disabilities to advance their independence, productivity and inclusion in the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School; the most unlike its peers is Rollinbuckeyez Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

APPLEWOOD CENTERS INC: $144,000 · OtherAPPLEWOOD CENTERS INCELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $74,500 · OtherELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTESALVATION ARMY: $68,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYACHIEVEMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN (CAMP CHEERFUL): $56,250 · OtherACHIEVEMENT CENTER FOR CHILDREN (CAMP CHEERFUL)PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $44,407 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF GREATER CLEVELAND (UCP): $44,000 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF GREATER CLEVELAND (UCP)HIRAM HOUSE CAMP: $40,000 · OtherCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $39,900 · OtherBUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES GARDEN FOR EVERY CHILD: $31,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY (CAMP NEOSA): $30,000 · OtherURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $28,000 · Other+7 more: $110,525 · Other+7 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND: $149,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC…The Centers for Families and Children: $96,000 · Human ServicesThe Centers for Families a…ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRAS…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesHATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION: $56,500 · PhilanthropyCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 · AnimalsROLLINBUCKEYEZ FOUNDATION: $37,500 · Youth Development
Other$750,582Human Services$274,500Philanthropy$56,500Animals$45,000Youth Development$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND: $149,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAPPLEWOOD CENTERS INC: $144,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children: $96,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $74,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION: $56,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $44,407 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROLLINBUCKEYEZ FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 5y, 35% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $28,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSING HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds APPLEWOOD CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
  • Who funds ELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROLLINBUCKEYEZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Corinne L Dodero Foundation for the Arts and Sciences · Giant Eagle Foundation · E S Prentiss Foundation-Ir · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cleveland Auto Club Orphans' Outing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph