Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cleon Dettmer Charitable Trust % the Peoples Bank

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$126k
Granted FY2026still arriving
20
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$336kReligion$265kFood & Nutrition$76kMembership Benefit$61kRecreation & Sports$52kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2026 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k17 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$5,340
Median grant
2
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY$19,760
ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH$12,171
KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,800
FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH$8,600
Individual grant recipient$7,500
AMERICAN LEGION OF KENSIN$7,400
Individual grant recipient$7,000
KENSINGTON MINISTERIAL ASSOC$5,500
HOME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,340
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY$4,960
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$4,960
KENSINGTON LIONS CLUB$4,300
Individual grant recipient$3,857
UNITED CHURCH OF KENSINGTON$3,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 20%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $13k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 20%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 20%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 11%FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%KENSINGTON SENIOR COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $10k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $9k → 11%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $9k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $9k → 11%FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $9k → 11%FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $8k → 11%FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $8k → 11%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR COMMUNITY: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 11%FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $8k → 11%KENSINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 11%AMERICAN LEGION OF KENSIN: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $7k → 11%FIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $7k → 11%KENSINGTON SENIOR CITIZEN: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$984k · 34 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2026, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
5

Total granted

$984k
$14k

Still filing today

15%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BETHANY COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • KW
    KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2026 · $8k · revenue +28%
  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • HC
    HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF KENSINGT
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
  • TP
    THE PAUL MITCHELL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
2
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody offers one, two, and four year degrees that lead to immediate jobs and great careers.

Education
3
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates College is a private, highly selective, residential college devoted to undergraduate study in the traditional disciplines of the liberal arts and sciences as well as in emerging interdisciplinary programs.

Education
5
Simpson College

A residential, coeducation, undergraduate liberal arts college.

Education
6
Clarkson University

Provide education for undergraduate, graduate, and professional continuing education programs, and to engage in high quality research and scholarship.

Education
7
Carleton College

To provide an exceptional undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
8
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
9
Macmurray College

To educate a diverse student population by providing a learning environment and programs of study that prepare graduates for professional careers and further education, equipping them with the broad skills and ethical insights of a liberal…

—
10
Westminster College

Promote education, the development of skills, knowledge, and personal qualities.

Education
11
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
12
Meredith College

Founded in 1891, meredith college offers comprehensive liberal arts and professional studies for undergraduate women. meredith challenges students to discover what makes them strong, build on those strengths, and prepare to make a positive…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Wesleyan University; the most unlike its peers is Kensington Home Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY: $130,080 · OtherFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITYST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $111,178 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCHKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $79,295 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYKENSINGTON FOOD PANTRY: $75,686 · OtherKENSINGTON FOOD PANTRYFIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CH: $72,536 · OtherFIRST ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHIndividual grant recipient: $65,015 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN LEGION OF KENSIN: $60,885 · OtherAMERICAN LEGION OF KENSINIndividual grant recipient: $42,073 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $39,664 · OtherKENSINGTON LIONS CLUB: $33,419 · Other+25 more: $243,104 · Other+25 moreBETHANY COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $8,380 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $7,795 · EducationFriends University: $4,180 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $2,480 · EducationKENSINGTON HOME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,390 · Community Improvement
Other$952,935Education$32,835Community Improvement$20,390

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENSINGTON HOME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,390 over 5y, 17% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $8,380 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $7,795 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends University: $4,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENSINGTON HOME CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Friends University ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Theodore W and Ruth a Levin Charitable TrustKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Theodore W and Ruth a Levin Charitable Trust · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Kansas Independent College Association · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Greater Salina Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cleon Dettmer Charitable Trust % the Peoples Bank funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cleon Dettmer Charitable Trust % the Peoples Bank. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cleon Dettmer Charitable Trust % the Peoples Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph