Skip to content

· Private foundation

Claude & Mae Moss Charities

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$28kHealth$10kPhilanthropy$7kEducation$4kReligion$4kHousing & Shelter$3kAnimals$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,300
Paramount Theatre$500
Christian Homes$500
West Shore Community Library$500
Nat'l Ctr Childrens' Illustrated Li$500
Individual grant recipient$400
Center for Contemporary Arts$225
Abilene Woman's Club$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NOROC Inc: $250 → 16%NOROC Inc: $250 → 16%NOROC Inc: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
23

Total granted

$67k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+38%

Still filing today

67%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureHealthEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +209%
  • NC
    National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat
    4× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +52%
  • SF
    Serenity Foundation of Texas
    2× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • LB
    Laura Bush Institute for Womens' He
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TT
    Texas Trails Council Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -10%
  • FB
    Food Bank of West Central Texasgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The purpose of the Organization is to provide knowledge and understanding of economics, matters of public concern, finance, education and training, and problems of minority groups therby promoting the economy and quality of life in Abilene…

—
2
Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc

The mission of the Arts Council is to nurture and strengthen the artistic, cultural and educational quality of the community.

Arts & Culture
3
Texas Cultural Trust Council

Public arts funding

Philanthropy
4
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
5
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
6
Historic Paramount Theatre Inc

Our mission is to manage and promote the Historic Paramount Theatre to benefit the citizens of Abilene, Texas and the surrounding area.

Arts & Culture
7
Waco Cultural Arts Fest

To engage and enrich our community by providing outstanding arts programming and cultural activities that inspire creativity and participation.

Arts & Culture
8
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
9
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
10
Creative Waco

Creative waco's mission is to grow and support a thriving cultural and creative community in waco and mclennan county, texas.

Arts & Culture
11
Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture

To provide leadership to support, promote and cultivate the arts in Wichita Falls and the surrounding area. To strengthen and elevate arts and culture including, but not limited to, visual and performing arts, literature, culinary arts,…

Arts & Culture
12
Abilene Philharmonic Association

Operating orchestra

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Abilene Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $12,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,385 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCParamount Theatre: $4,000 · OtherParamount TheatreIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChristian Homes: $3,250 · OtherChristian HomesCASA: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+23 more: $14,134 · Other+23 moreABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureABILENE ARTS ALLIANCENational Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat: $9,200 · Arts & CultureNational Center for Childrens…Taylor County History Center: $1,275 · Arts & CultureTaylor County History CenterGRACE MUSEUM INC: $1,125 · Arts & CultureAbilene Opera Association: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $650 · Arts & CultureSerenity Foundation of Texas: $9,000 · HealthSerenity Fo…+1 more: $200 · HealthAbilene Education Foundation: $2,000 · EducationWEST SHORE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $1,500 · EducationAbilene Zoological Society: $2,600 · AnimalsFood Bank of West Central Texas: $1,100 · Food & NutritionNOROC INC: $750 · Human Services
Other$48,019Arts & Culture$23,250Health$9,200Education$3,500Animals$2,600Food & Nutrition$1,100Human Services$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetNational Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat: $9,200 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSerenity Foundation of Texas: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,385 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWEST SHORE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $1,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTaylor County History Center: $1,275 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTexas Trails Council Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC: $1,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of West Central Texas: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Opera Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNOROC INC: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Arts: $550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCancer Services Network Inc: $320 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Preservation League Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat ↗
  • Who funds Serenity Foundation of Texas ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WEST SHORE COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Taylor County History Center ↗
  • Who funds Texas Trails Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of West Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ABILENE INC ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Opera Association ↗
  • Who funds NOROC INC ↗
  • Who funds Zambia Christian College Inc dba Zambia Mission Fund ↗
  • Who funds Center for Contemporary Arts ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Services Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Strength for Life Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Greathouse Foundation · Shelton Family Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · The Robison Excelsior Foundation · The Karakin Foundation · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Jm Parker Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Claude & Mae Moss Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Claude & Mae Moss Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Claude & Mae Moss Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Claude & Mae Moss Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Claude & Mae Moss Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph