Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$1.5MArts & Culture$951kReligion$476kHuman Services$340kHousing & Shelter$316kEducation$154kYouth Development$100kHealth$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Museum of Fine Arts Houston$100,000
Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo Inc$80,000
Saint Louise House$50,000
Camp Allen Camp & Conference Center$50,000
Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo Inc$40,000
Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston$30,000
Christian Community Service Center Inc$25,000
DePelchin's Children's Center$25,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star$25,000
TIRR Foundation$20,000
Holocaust Museum Houston$15,000
St Michael the Archangel Catholic Church$10,000
The Church of St John the Divine$10,000
Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo Inc$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Christian Community Service Center: $25k → 16%Christian Community Service Center Inc: $25k → 16%Today's Harbor for Children: $108k → 16%DePelchin's Children's Center: $25k → 16%Depelchin Childrens Center: $25k → 16%Today's Harbor for Children: $20k → 16%Today's Harbor for Children: $20k → 16%Today's Harbor for Children: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 23 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$3.8M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

61%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON
    8× · 2017–2025 · $711k · revenue +96%
  • HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $500k · revenue +22%
  • CA
    Camp Allen Camp & Conference Center
    6× · 2018–2025 · $315k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Louise House (Vincare Services of Austin Foundation)
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • SM
    St Mary Catholic School
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
  • TB
    THE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

3
The Awty International School

See Schedule OThe purpose of Awty International School (Awty) is to create an environment where students experience excellence every day to make their mark on the world alongside their community, in a spirit of curiosity, courage and…

4
The Heritage Society

The Heritage Society (THS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1954 whose mission is to tell the stories of the diverse history of Houston and Texas through collections, exhibits, the arts, educational programs, film, video, and other…

5
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
7
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
8
St John's School

See Schedule OSt. John's School is an independent, co-educational day school presenting a 13-year sequence of college preparatory training. A non-profit institution, it was founded in 1946 to provide the community with a school of exacting…

9
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
10
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
11
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
12
Contemporary Arts Museum Houston

CAMH presents extraordinary and thought-provoking arts programming and exhibitions.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adams Army. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Houston Livestock Show Rodeo — $638,000 · OtherHouston Livestock Show RodeoCamp Allen Camp & Conference Center — $315,000 · OtherCamp Allen Camp & Conference CenterVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION — $310,000 · OtherVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATIONInterfaith Ministries of Greater Ho — $260,000 · OtherInterfaith Ministries of Greater HoInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston — $126,000 · OtherInterfaith Ministries for Greater HoustonTHE CHURCH OF ST JOHN THE DIVINE — $70,000 · OtherSt Louise House (Vincare Services of Austin Foundation) — $70,000 · Other+14 more — $263,170 · Other+14 moreTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON — $710,500 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HO…HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON — $210,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON+1 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC — $500,000 · Recreation & SportsHOUSTON LIVEST…TODAYS HARBOR FOR CHILDREN — $157,501 · Human ServicesChristian Community Service Center Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentTIRR Foundation — $70,000 · HealthAdams Army — $10,000 · HealthThe Westview School Inc — $50,000 · EducationTHE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL — $25,000 · Education
Other$2,052,170Arts & Culture$941,000Recreation & Sports$500,000Human Services$257,501Youth Development$100,000Health$80,000Education$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON — $710,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC — $500,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Allen Camp & Conference Center — $315,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION — $310,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON — $210,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTODAYS HARBOR FOR CHILDREN — $157,501 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston — $126,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTIRR Foundation — $70,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetThe Westview School Inc — $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRiver Oaks Chamber Orchestra — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAdams Army — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON
  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC
  • Who funds Camp Allen Camp & Conference Center
  • Who funds VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON
  • Who funds TODAYS HARBOR FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR
  • Who funds TIRR Foundation
  • Who funds The Westview School Inc
  • Who funds Christian Community Service Center Inc
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER
  • Who funds THE BRIARWOOD SCHOOL
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds River Oaks Chamber Orchestra
  • Who funds FORMER TEXAS RANGERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Adams Army
  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX18.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Strake Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Ellwood Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clark and Charlene Thompson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph