Skip to content

· Private foundation

CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$677kHealth$15k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas A&M Foundation$30,000
Texas A&M University$21,000
University of Arkansas$18,000
University of North Texas$15,000
Prairie View A&M Univerity$12,000
University of Oklahoma$12,000
University of Texas at Austin$9,000
University of Texas at Arlington$9,000
Grambling State University$6,000
Texas State University$6,000
West Coast University$6,000
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor$6,000
Tabor College$6,000
Texas Wesleyan University$6,000
Southern University$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%University of North Texas: $15k → 8%Texas State University: $6k → 10%Child Study Center: $5k → 11%Austin College: $5k → 11%North Central Texas College: $6k → 13%Tarleton State University: $6k → 13%West Coast University: $6k → 14%University of Mary Hardin-Baylor: $8k → 14%Prairie View A&M Univerity: $15k → 14%Abilene Christian University: $8k → 16%Lamar University: $6k → 19%Texas A&M University: $44k → 22%University of Oklahoma: $15k → 13%University of Arkansas: $18k → 14%Tabor College: $6k → 10%Southern University: $6k → 19%Grambling State University: $6k → 32%University of North Texas: $10k → 8%Texas State University: $5k → 10%Child Study Center: $5k → 11%Austin College: $5k → 11%Tarleton State University: $5k → 13%University of Mary Hardin-Baylor: $6k → 14%Prairie View A&M Univerity: $12k → 14%Abilene Christian University: $6k → 16%Texas A&M University: $21k → 22%University of Oklahoma: $12k → 13%University of Arkansas: $10k → 14%University of North Texas: $8k → 8%Prairie View A&M Univerity: $7k → 14%Texas A&M University: $18k → 22%University of Oklahoma: $8k → 13%University of Arkansas: $6k → 14%University of North Texas: $6k → 8%University of Texas at Austin: $9k → 10%Prairie View A&M Univerity: $6k → 14%Texas A&M University: $9k → 22%University of North Texas: $5k → 8%University of Texas at Austin: $5k → 10%Texas A&M University: $9k → 22%Texas A&M University: $8k → 22%Texas Wesleyan University: $6k → 11%Texas A&M Foundation: $30k → 22%Texas A&M Foundation: $30k → 22%University of Texas at Arlington: $9k → 11%University of Texas at Arlington: $8k → 11%Texas Christian University: $6k → 11%Texas Christian University: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$634k · 25 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$634k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +48%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR
    2× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +3%
  • AC
    AUSTIN COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • SF
    Stephen F Austin State University
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TC
    Tarrant County College
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • NT
    Northeast Texas Community College
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
6
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin-Simmons University; the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Texas A&M University: $110,300 · OtherTexas A&M UniversityTexas Tech University: $63,950 · OtherTexas Tech UniversityUniversity of North Texas: $50,650 · OtherUniversity of North TexasUniversity of Arkansas: $45,400 · OtherUniversity of ArkansasPrairie View A&M Univerity: $41,900 · OtherPrairie View A&M UniverityUniversity of Oklahoma: $41,400 · OtherUniversity of OklahomaTarleton State University: $23,150 · OtherUniversity of Texas at Austin: $23,000 · OtherTexas State University: $22,250 · OtherUniversity of Texas at Arlington: $18,000 · Other+13 more: $76,850 · Other+13 moreTexas A&M Foundation: $60,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationChild Study Center: $14,500 · EducationChild Study CenterUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $13,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BA…AUSTIN COLLEGE: $12,900 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGEMCMURRY UNIVERSITY: $11,500 · EducationMCMURRY UNIVERSITYTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · EducationTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $10,400 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITYBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $9,250 · EducationTabor College: $6,000 · EducationHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationSOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · Education
Other$516,850Education$174,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $15,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChild Study Center: $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $12,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $10,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $9,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTabor College: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Child Study Center ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MCMURRY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Tabor College ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert A Welch FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert A Welch Foundation · The Buddy Bostick Foundation · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Richard Wallrath Educational Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to CJ Wrightsman Educational Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on CJ Wrightsman Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph