Skip to content
City of Muskogee Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

City of Muskogee Foundation Inc

The foundation provides grants to various non-profit organizations related to economic development, health and wellness, education and empowerment, and quality for life which meet the mission criteria of the foundation.

$5.9M
Granted FY2026still arriving
32
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$24MPublic Benefit$19MEnvironment$13MEducation$4.4MArts & Culture$2.9MHousing & Shelter$2.2MHuman Services$2.2MYouth Development$1.8MOther$0
02FY2026 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $226k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.3M
$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$173M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF MUSKOGEE$1,200,000
MUSKOGEE PUBLIC SAFETY AUTHORITY$600,000
MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$503,721
MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$479,735
MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$456,890
MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC$435,134
MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY$424,520
NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORS$250,000
CITY OF MUSKOGEE$199,400
EASTERN OK DEVELOPMENT DIST$195,000
OKLAHOMA MUSIC HALL OF FAME$160,000
MUSKOGEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$150,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$140,693
GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SER$105,750
NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%VIZAVANCE: $10k → 16%VIZAVANCE: $10k → 16%RISE: $10k → 19%BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $1.9M → 19%MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $504k → 19%MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $480k → 19%MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $457k → 19%MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $435k → 19%MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $425k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 33% of City of Muskogee Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 86%.

City of Muskogee Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$82M · 30 repeat orgs$545k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
12

Total granted

$82M
$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DOWNTOWN MUSKOGEE INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $11M · revenue +66%
  • MB
    MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC
    2× · 2021–2026 · $4.2M · revenue +12%
  • NB
    NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC
    9× · 2018–2026 · $3.9M · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • MW
    MUSKOGEE WAR MEMORIAL
    one grant, 2025 · $150k
  • GM
    GREATER MUSKOGEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue -18%
  • II
    ICTC INDIAN CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY CENT
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskogee Organization for Narcotic and Alcohol

To provide quality, recovery oriented, trauma informed, gender sensitive, age appropriate, and culturally compentent services to men, women, and children wose lives have been affected by substance abuse and/or mental illness

—
2
Muskogee Medical Foundation

To raise and administer funds for the benefit of the health care needs of residents of muskogee, oklahoma, and its immediate surrounding area.

Human Services
3
City of Muskogee Foundation Inc

The foundation provides grants to various non-profit organizations related to economic development, health and wellness, education and empowerment, and quality for life which meet the mission criteria of the foundation. the grants are used…

Community Improvement
4
Read Muskegon

To increase the quality of life in muskegon county through improved literacy.

Education
5
Muskogee County Coun of Youth Ser

Youth services

Health
6
Okmulgee Area Development Corp

Economic development in okmulgee county

Community Improvement
7
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
8
Okmulgee-Okfuskee County Youth Services

To shelter and improve the quality of life for children, youth, and families in the corporations service area by addressing mental health needs through direct services of shelter, consultation, counseling, and education.

Crime & Legal
9
Muskegon Heritage Association

Maintain historical museum

—
10
Fort Osage National Historic Landmark Association

Education

Philanthropy
11
Muskogee Habitat for Humanity

build houses and sell to low income families

Housing & Shelter
12
Five Civilized Tribes Museum & Center for Study of

The organization holds numerous art shows throughout the year which showcase indian art. the museum sponsors workshops for the public and encourages participation in these workshops and showcases.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors Building Neighborhoods Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Barracks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF MUSKOGEE: $31,677,808 · OtherCITY OF MUSKOGEECITY-COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY: $18,774,341 · OtherCITY-COUNTY PORT AUTHORITYMUSKOGEE CITYCOUNTY 911 TR AUTH: $3,035,625 · Other+29 more: $8,160,125 · Other+29 moreDOWNTOWN MUSKOGEE INC: $10,820,000 · EnvironmentDOWNTOWN MUSKO…MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $4,244,850 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH: $163,945 · Human Services+2 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $3,923,785 · Community Improvement+1 more: $18,750 · Community ImprovementCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN INC: $912,079 · Civil RightsMUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $549,663 · Civil RightsCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $573,520 · PhilanthropyLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $324,087 · HealthKELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC: $177,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Health
Other$61,647,899Environment$10,820,000Human Services$4,438,795Community Improvement$3,942,535Civil Rights$1,461,742Philanthropy$598,520Health$566,087

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $3,923,785 over 9y, 14% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN INC: $912,079 over 9y, 24% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF MUSKOGEE INC: $900,000 over 6y, 97% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $573,520 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $549,663 over 9y, 46% of budgetOKLAHOMA MUSIC HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $355,373 over 2y, 62% of budgetGREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES: $324,087 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC: $177,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH: $163,945 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetMUSKOGEE COMMUNITY BAND ASSOCIATION: $90,500 over 5y, 44% of budgetFUR BABIES ADOPTIONS AND RESCUE: $85,400 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetGREATER MUSKOGEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $70,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHREE RIVERS MUSEUM OF MUSKOGEE INC: $59,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMUSKOGEE ART GUILD INC: $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetLAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTHE BARRACKS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetVIZAVANCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetConnors Development Foundation Inc: $18,750 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRISE CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOWNTOWN MUSKOGEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS BUILDING NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF MUSKOGEE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA MUSIC HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN COUNTRY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds KELLY B TODD CEREBRAL PALSY AND NEURO-MUSCULAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE COMMUNITY BAND ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FUR BABIES ADOPTIONS AND RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MUSKOGEE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS MUSEUM OF MUSKOGEE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE ART GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARRACKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC DBA Muskogee STEAM Center ↗
  • Who funds VIZAVANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationE Phil & Roberta Kirs…Muskogee Welfare Asso…Miller Family Foundat…Feed the Children IncThe Anne and Henry Za…Tulsa Community Found…Oge Energy Corp Found…Sarkeys FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Union Pacific Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…
Arvest FoundationAR28× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · E Phil & Roberta Kirschner Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc · Muskogee Welfare Association Inc · Miller Family Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Union Pacific Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization City of Muskogee Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from City of Muskogee Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Neighbors Building Neighborhoods Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Green Country Behavioral Health Services: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on City of Muskogee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home