Skip to content

· Private foundation

Citrone Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MSocial Science$1.0MPhilanthropy$302kYouth Development$176kEducation$164kCommunity Improvement$81kInternational$60kArts & Culture$59kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT$75,199
THE PINK AGENDA$35,857
KULTURE CITY$10,900
CHILDREN'S AID HOME$10,000
THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY$5,000
MARY QUEEN OF PEACE PARISH$5,000
SECOND CHANCE FUNDRAISING$1,000
Individual grant recipient$323
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH$240
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SONDER HOUSE: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $206 → 6%KULTURE CITY: $11k → 16%RACING FOR ORPHANS WITH DOWN SYNDROME: $4k → 8%JAMESON'S ARMY: $6k → 12%RACING FOR ORPHANS WITH DOWN SYNDROME: $2k → 8%JAMESONS ARMY: $5k → 12%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $25k → 13%RACING FOR ORPHANS WITH DOWN SYNDROME: $457 → 8%JAMESON'S ARMY: $2k → 12%YOUR MOM CARES: $1k → 14%AL'S ANGELS: $500 → 9%AL'S ANGELS: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 38 repeat orgs$958k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
107

Total granted

$2.1M
$862k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+26%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +387%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $213k · revenue +40%
  • TP
    THE PINK AGENDA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPTIAL OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2017 · $324k
  • TI
    THE IRELAND FUNDS
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • HF
    HOPEWELL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $49k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
7
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
8
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
9
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to accelerate the development of breakthrough immune therapies to turn all cancers into curable diseases.

Health
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors; the most unlike its peers is Sonder House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/76
Grantees still filing
56/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $1,010,162 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTECHILDREN'S HOSPTIAL OF PITTSBURGH: $324,100 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPTIAL OF PITTSBURGHUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER: $102,500 · Other+103 more: $680,366 · Other+103 moreSocial Impact Fund: $100,000 · PhilanthropySocial Impact …PITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $91,935 · PhilanthropyPITTSBURGH PEN…ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $40,964 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S …BORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION: $35,644 · PhilanthropyBORN THIS WAY …HM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyHM3 PARTNERS I…PINK AID INC: $29,833 · PhilanthropyPINK AID INCTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $24,614 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING BAC…MARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $23,486 · PhilanthropyMARIO LEMIEUX …Best of the Batch Foundation: $14,101 · Philanthropy+4 more: $11,826 · PhilanthropyTHE PINK AGENDA INC: $70,097 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 · HealthELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 · HealthINHERITANCE OF HOPE INC: $32,613 · HealthCURE DUCHENNE: $15,000 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $10,025 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $10,000 · Health+9 more: $27,235 · HealthTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $212,778 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $60,560 · EducationElon University: $16,129 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education+9 more: $15,847 · EducationNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $75,199 · Community ImprovementTHE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC: $4,374 · Community Improvement+1 more: $1,500 · Community ImprovementA BROADER WAY FOUNDATION: $61,906 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,117,128Philanthropy$402,403Health$246,970Public Safety & Disaster$213,778Education$102,536Community Improvement$81,073Recreation & Sports$61,906

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $1,010,162 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $212,778 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $91,935 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $75,199 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PINK AGENDA INC: $70,097 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetA BROADER WAY FOUNDATION: $61,906 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE: $60,560 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $40,964 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION: $35,644 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINHERITANCE OF HOPE INC: $32,613 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetPINK AID INC: $29,833 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $24,614 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $23,486 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetElon University: $16,129 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $15,837 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND SPORT FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBest of the Batch Foundation: $14,101 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJAMESON'S ARMY: $13,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetKultureCity: $10,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC: $10,025 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDONATE LIFE AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAPPLES AND ORANGES ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $9,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $7,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRODS HEROES INC: $6,437 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $5,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Vincent's Medical Center Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTONE RIDGE FOUNDATION NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHY VETERANS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEAR AND FAR ASSOCIATION INC: $4,374 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC: $3,691 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $3,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $3,267 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS: $2,595 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNSORO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pledgeling FoundationCA19.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pledgeling Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Upmc Group · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Tull Family Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Citrone Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Citrone Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Laurel House Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Citrone’s filings →

More from the funding graph