How much did CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE grant in FY2025?

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE reported 6 grants totaling $15,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE based?

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE is based in PA.

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE

Pennfuture is leading the fight for an equitable, job-creating state economy by advancing clean air, pure water, and climate change solutions through legal advocacy, policy engagement, and empowering all pennsylvanians.

$15k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$2k

Largest

01What you fund

0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Environment$153kPhilanthropy$45kEducation$40kCivil Rights$15kCommunity Improvement$4kYouth Development$2kHousing & Shelter$2kHealth$1kOther$165k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

pipelineenvironmental

2021

—

2022

voter

2023

—

2025

wpf glpglp stipend

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

RIVERFRONT NORTH PARTNERSHIP (DELAWARE RIVER CITY CORP0$2,000
NUEVA ESPERANZA HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$2,000
YOUNG CHANCES FOUNDATION$2,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$2,000
JASTECH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC$2,000
PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT CORPORATION$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 76% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$236k · 4 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$236k

$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%

+121%

Still filing today

75%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CV
CONVERSATION VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA
2× · 2018–2019 · $76k · revenue +384%
DR
DELAWARE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK
2× · 2019–2020 · $75k · revenue -50%
CV
CONSERVATION VOTERS OF PA
2× · 2022–2023 · $45k

Funded once

CA
CLEAN AIR COUNCILgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $84k · revenue +121%
BP
BREATHE PROJECTgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +175%
EI
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECTgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Pennsylvania Environmental Council Inc

Since 1970, the pennsylvania environmental council (pec) has participated as a central figure in the environmental and conservation discussion in pennsylvania and we will continue to do so. every day, pec manages challenges facing…

Environment

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future

Environment

Pa Assoc

Promote soil & water conservation programs of pennsylvania's conservation districts

—

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Inc

The mission of Central Pennsylvania Conservancy (CPC) is to acquire, preserve, and protect local land and natural resources in a five-county, South-Central PA region.

Environment

Energy Coordinating Agency of

Helps people conserve energy and promotes a sustainable and socially equitable energy for all in the philadelphia region.

Housing & Shelter

Philadelphia Green Capital Corp

The philadelphia green capital corp. connects projects to capital (public, private and philanthropic) to drive a robust, equitable clean energy market in the greater philadelphia region, support the philadelphia energy authority, and…

Community Improvement

Pennypack Ecological Restoration Trust

Protection and preservation of the pennypack creek watershed.

Environment

Pa Alliance Foundation

Focused on civic engagement and democracy advancement across pennsylvania.

Civil Rights

Pennsylvania Organization for Watersheds

Pennsylvania organization for watersheds and rivers (powr) provides the tools, training, education and resources that empower community watershed organization leaders and volunteers to protect and restore rivers and streams, advocate for…

Environment

Pennsylvania Resources Council Inc

We steward resources to prevent waste and conserve the environment.

Environment

Lead Pa

Cultivating the next generation of progressive leaders across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

—

Pennenvironment Research and Policy Center Inc

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania and the most unlike its peers is Young Chances Foundations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

13/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$167,757Environment$153,000Philanthropy$45,000Education$40,372Civil Rights$14,700Community Improvement$4,000Youth Development$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heinz EndowmentsPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Park Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: O'HARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +89% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 233095581 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on O'HARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 56% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future?

Find your warmest path to Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future?

More from the funding graph

CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future?

More from the funding graph