Skip to content
Cinnaire Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Cinnaire Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$338kHousing & Shelter$333kCommunity Improvement$324kPhilanthropy$217kYouth Development$65kRecreation & Sports$64kHuman Services$61kCivil Rights$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER LANSING AREA HOLIDAY COMMISSION$50,000
MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF UNITED WAYS$50,000
CHILDREN TRUST MICHIGAN$21,267
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OHIO & INDIANA$10,000
TRINITY HAVEN INC$7,206
NERDIT FOUNDATION$7,206
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION$7,206
KARUNA INC$7,206
HAVEN HOUSE$5,000
STRIKEOUT BASEBALL USA$5,000
CASA FOR KIDS INC$2,533
HDC MIDATLANTIC$1,000
PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING$1,000
CHOSEN VISION$542
GREATER INDY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$528
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $295k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $1k → 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $200 → 14%COMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC: $4k → 21%CAP SERVICES: $500 → 10%KARUNA INC: $7k → 12%GREATER MILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE: $3k → 17%SHELTERING WNGS CENTER FOR WOMEN: $2k → 5%SCAN INC: $1k → 12%MEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500 → 15%TRINITY HAVEN INC: $7k → 16%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $10k → 8%YMCA MADISON: $200 → 10%LIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $500 → 8%SAMARITAS: $3k → 21%METROPOLITAN WILMINGTON URBAN LEAGUE: $2k → 10%SAMARITAS: $3k → 21%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN: $100 → 11%COMMUNITY AND HOME SUPPORTS: $263 → 21%SMALL TALK CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $250k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
NE
MD
DE
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$628k · 15 repeat orgs$912k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
103

Total granted

$628k
$846k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

87%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREATER LANSING AREA HOLIDAY COMMISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $270k · revenue +153% · 93% of their budget
  • HAVEN HOUSE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +49%
  • LL
    LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER
    2× · 2019–2021 · $11k · revenue +336%

Funded once

  • CL
    CINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION (RESIDENT RELIEF FUND)
    one grant, 2021 · $251k
  • AN
    Allen Neighborhood Center
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -18%
  • DM
    DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Affordable Housing Corporation of Lake County

To provide decent, safe and sanitary housing that is affordable to low and moderate-income persons and to stabilize and strengthen communities by improving the local housing stock. the corporation shall administer programs that revitalize…

Human Services
2
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
3
Chn Housing Partners

Chn's mission is to leverage the power of affordable housing to improve lives and communities.

Housing & Shelter
4
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
5
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
6
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
7
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of Duluth One Roof Lending

To provide financing that will help people of lower income find, purchase, and fix their homes, for both single family homes as well as rental housing situations.

Community Improvement
10
Linc Up Nonprofit Housing Corporation

Stimulate community revitalization through providing quality affordable housing in kent county, michigan for persons of low and moderate income, through other homeowner assistance, through community organizing, and commercial development.

Housing & Shelter
11
Detroit Central City Cmh Inc

Detroit central city community mental health's mission is to achieve wellness in the community by providing an integrated array of mental health, housing and substance abuse services with diginity and respect.

Health
12
Community Housing Initiatives Inc

The mission of community housing initiatives, inc. is to leverage and maximize opportunities for vibrant and resilient communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Capital Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is Small Talk Children's Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/89
Grantees still filing
58/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION (RESIDENT RELIEF FUND): $250,838 · OtherCINNAIRE LENDING CORPORATION (RESIDENT RELIEF…DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMISSION: $50,000 · OtherDR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMISSIONAVIS FORD INC: $30,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN LANSING INC: $30,000 · OtherMICHIGAN CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND: $26,810 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALPENA: $25,000 · OtherMICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $21,267 · Other+77 more: $185,806 · Other+77 moreAllen Neighborhood Center: $250,000 · Human ServicesAllen Neighborhood Ce…LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $10,500 · Human Services+15 more: $34,483 · Human Services+15 moreGREATER LANSING AREA HOLIDAY COMMISSION: $270,000 · EducationGREATER LANSING AREA …+8 more: $17,319 · Education+8 moreMichigan Association of United Ways Inc: $210,000 · PhilanthropyMichigan Associ…+2 more: $678 · PhilanthropySTRIKEOUT BASEBALL: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $2,625 · Recreation & SportsRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $2,102 · Recreation & SportsHAVEN HOUSE: $25,852 · Housing & ShelterMISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC: $7,206 · Housing & ShelterLACASA OF GOSHEN INC: $2,102 · Housing & ShelterCAPITAL AREA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $1,749 · Housing & Shelter+7 more: $7,910 · Housing & ShelterNERDIT FOUNDATION: $7,206 · Community ImprovementINDIANA AFFORDABLE HOUSING COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementFORWARD COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS INC: $1,617 · Community ImprovementNORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION ORGANIZATION INC: $1,220 · Community Improvement
Other$619,721Human Services$294,983Education$287,319Philanthropy$210,678Recreation & Sports$59,727Housing & Shelter$52,319Community Improvement$15,043

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER LANSING AREA HOLIDAY COMMISSION: $270,000 over 5y, 93% of budgetAllen Neighborhood Center: $250,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMichigan Association of United Ways Inc: $210,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSTRIKEOUT BASEBALL: $55,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE: $25,852 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALPENA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $10,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMNIA INSTITUTE FOR CONTEXTUAL LEADERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetMISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC: $7,206 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKARUNAINC: $7,206 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTRINITY HAVEN INC: $7,206 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA AFFORDABLE HOUSING COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetANDYS ANGELS: $4,220 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC: $3,857 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAUL'S PLACE INC: $3,594 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMB USA INC: $3,594 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOLY CROSS SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INC: $2,885 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $2,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE: $2,594 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS INC: $2,533 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLACASA OF GOSHEN INC: $2,102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $2,102 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER: $2,102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTINA CULTURAL ARTS CENTER INC: $2,102 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPIRE RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION: $2,102 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK: $2,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBADGERBOTS ROBOTICS CORPORATION: $1,951 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLATIN UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSN: $1,951 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $1,951 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $1,951 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST END NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $1,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $1,797 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLADIES OF VIRTUE: $1,797 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKheprw Institute dba KI NuMedia CCFI: $1,749 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $1,749 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN WILMINGTON URBAN LEAGUEINC: $1,749 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $1,749 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FREE MEDICAL INC: $1,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOSEN VISION INC: $1,662 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $1,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS INC: $1,617 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEENSHARP: $1,617 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHFIELDS INC: $1,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER LANSING AREA HOLIDAY COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds Allen Neighborhood Center ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Association of United Ways Inc ↗
  • Who funds STRIKEOUT BASEBALL ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALPENA ↗
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMNIA INSTITUTE FOR CONTEXTUAL LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FIRST HOUSING GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds NERDIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds KARUNAINC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAS ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA AFFORDABLE HOUSING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDYS ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY & HOME SUPPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY CROSS SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Commun…Community Foundation …Consumers Energy Foun…Michigan Health Endow…Delta Dental Plan of …Laffey-McHugh Foundat…Dart Foundation fka S…DTE Energy FoundationLansing Economic Area…Desk Drawer FundDelaware Community Fo…Wsfs Cares Foundation
Capital Region Community FoundationMI31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Delta Dental Plan of Michigan Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · Desk Drawer Fund · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cinnaire Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cinnaire Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Reach Riverside Development Corp: 100% of income from government
  • Christina Cultural Arts Center Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Delaware: 40% of income from government
  • West End Neighborhood House Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Paul's Place Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of New Castle County: 21% of income from government
  • Teensharp: 11% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Boston Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Serviam Girls Academy Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cinnaire’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home