· Private foundation
Cindy and Tony Weber Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+5 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COUNCIL FOR LIFE | $662,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $300,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300,000 |
| ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS | $255,000 |
| UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $250,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH DALLAS | $100,000 |
| TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH DALLAS | $25,000 |
| AOPA FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| CIRCLE TEN COUNCIL | $6,000 |
| POINT OF VIEW | $5,000 |
| BREAKAWAY MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $854k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.
31 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $556k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY5× · 2017–2025 · $786k · revenue +39%
- CFCOUNCIL FOR LIFE9× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +257% · 26% of their budget
- TATexas A&M Foundation8× · 2017–2025 · $396k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- TWTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $112k · revenue +26%
- NFNGP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $11k
- HPHIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUBone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -16%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…
As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
To assure that dermatologists have access to the highest quality education, research and innovations in the field, and that patients and the public have access to the highest quality medical and surgical dermatologic care and to…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
How this is measured
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND PARK SPORTS CLUB ↗
- Who funds STATE FAIR OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds AIM FOR SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 571 CIRCLE TEN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN HEALTH ADVANCES ↗
- Who funds INVOLVED FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CRISWELL COLLEGE ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Rowling Foundation · George E Seay III Foundation · The Rosewood Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Trinity Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Cindy and Tony Weber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cindy and Tony Weber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cindy and Tony Weber Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cindy and Tony Weber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Cindy and Tony Weber’s filings →