Skip to content

· Public charity

Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc

Cicoa empowers older adults, those of any age with a disability, and their caregivers by providing the innovative answers, services, and support they need to achieve the greatest possible independence, dignity, and quality of life.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$323k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$5.1MCrime & Legal$2.1MHealth$785k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $697k
  • $250k+1 grant · $323k
$53,182
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES INC$322,979
PRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC$142,992
SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES$119,809
HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$108,644
JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$82,698
STILL WATERS ADULT DAY CENTER$82,017
SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY$56,481
CATHOLIC CHARITIES INDIANAPOLIS INC$53,182
TMP ENTERPRISES INC (DBA JOY'S HOUSE CARE AND COMMUNITY)$51,263
BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$44,373
MORGAN COUNTY CONNECT$37,700
LITTLE REED DOOR CANCER AGENCY$37,263
HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES$23,093
A SENIOR RETREAT$10,603
JOHN BONER COMMUNITY CENTER$9,120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hancock County Senior Services: $55k → 5%BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $51k → 5%HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $120k → 5%JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $83k → 8%MORGAN COUNTY CONNECT: $35k → 9%SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES: $120k → 14%Hancock County Senior Services: $52k → 5%Boone County Senior Services Inc: $50k → 5%HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $117k → 5%Johnson County Senior Services: $62k → 8%SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES: $93k → 14%HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $51k → 5%Boone County Senior Services Inc: $50k → 5%HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $112k → 5%Johnson County Senior Services: $61k → 8%Shelby Senior Services: $92k → 14%HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $48k → 5%BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $50k → 5%Hendricks County Senior Services: $111k → 5%Johnson County Senior Services: $61k → 8%SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES: $91k → 14%HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $47k → 5%BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $48k → 5%Hendricks County Senior Services: $109k → 5%JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $61k → 8%SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES: $90k → 14%HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $46k → 5%BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $48k → 5%Hendricks County Senior Services: $109k → 5%JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $61k → 8%SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES: $83k → 14%Hancock County Senior Services: $38k → 5%Boone County Senior Services Inc: $47k → 5%HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $109k → 5%JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $59k → 8%Shelby Senior Services: $75k → 14%BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $44k → 5%HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $106k → 5%JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $47k → 8%Shelby Senior Services: $66k → 14%JOY'S HOUSE: $54k → 16%TMP ENTERPRISES INC (DBA JOY'S HOUSE CARE AND COMMUNITY): $51k → 16%JOY'S HOUSE: $49k → 16%Joy's House: $42k → 16%Joy's House: $42k → 16%JOY'S HOUSE: $39k → 16%JOY'S HOUSE: $30k → 16%THE VILLAGES: $28k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.9M · 17 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$7.9M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-14%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IL
    Indiana Legal Services Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +145%
  • HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $892k · revenue +58%
  • SS
    SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $709k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CA
    COORDINATED AGING SERVICE-MORGAN COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • HP
    Heritage Place of Indianapolis Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -14%
  • IO
    INDIANAPOLIS OASIS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Community Services Inc

To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.

Human Services
2
Elderserve Inc

Elderserve, inc. provides services to empower older adults to live indepeendently with dignity in louisville/jefferson county.

Human Services
3
Eldercare Services Institute Llc

Eldercare services institute, llc provides a full-range of home and community based services for older adults and their caregivers.

Health
4
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
5
Indiana Guardianship Services

At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…

Human Services
6
Senior Services Center of Will County

To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…

—
7
Clermont Senior Services Inc

To offer a broad range of community based and Home-Care Services designed to enable older adults to remain independent and active by living healthy lives.

Human Services
8
Incorporated Senior Citizens of Sierra County

To identify the needs of seniors and work to meet them, while treating all with dignity adn respect. encouraging others to do the same.

Human Services
9
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
10
Clinton Area Care Center Inc

To help the elderly maintain their health and independence as long as possible.

Human Services
11
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
12
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelby Senior Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Place of Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $892,494 · Human ServicesHENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INCSHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $709,449 · Human ServicesSHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INCJOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $495,625 · Human ServicesJOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INCBOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $387,539 · Human ServicesBOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INCHANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $359,026 · Human ServicesHANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INCTMP Enterprises Inc: $347,770 · Human ServicesTMP Enterprises IncSYCAMORE REHABILITATION SERVICES HENDRICKS COUNTY ARC INC: $244,592 · Human ServicesSYCAMORE REHABILITATION SERVICES HENDRICKS COUNTY A…The Villages of Indiana Inc: $170,768 · Human ServicesIndiana Legal Services Inc: $2,131,707 · Crime & LegalIndiana Legal Services IncPRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC: $930,639 · OtherPRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INCCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc: $377,395 · OtherCatholic Charities Bloomingt…CASTLETON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $167,374 · OtherCASTLETON UNITED METHODIST C…ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF GREATER INDIANA: $138,945 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF G…THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $126,481 · OtherTHE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAM…JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $119,353 · OtherJOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTE…+4 more: $120,235 · Other+4 moreLITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC: $268,925 · HealthHeritage Place of Indianapolis Inc: $5,402 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$3,607,263Crime & Legal$2,131,707Other$1,980,422Health$268,925Housing & Shelter$5,402

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana Legal Services Inc: $2,131,707 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetPRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC: $930,639 over 8y, 47% of budgetHENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $892,494 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetSHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $709,449 over 8y, 16% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $495,625 over 8y, 14% of budgetBOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $387,539 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc: $377,395 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetHANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $359,026 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetTMP Enterprises Inc: $347,770 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetLITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC: $268,925 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetSYCAMORE REHABILITATION SERVICES HENDRICKS COUNTY ARC INC: $244,592 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Villages of Indiana Inc: $170,768 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $126,481 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetJOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $119,353 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Indianapolis Inc: $53,182 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHeritage Place of Indianapolis Inc: $5,402 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS OASIS: $5,330 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TMP Enterprises Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SYCAMORE REHABILITATION SERVICES HENDRICKS COUNTY ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds The Villages of Indiana Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc ↗
  • Who funds Heritage Place of Indianapolis Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS OASIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN37.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Second Helpings Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · St Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center Inc · St Vincent Health Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph