· Public charity
Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc
Cicoa empowers older adults, those of any age with a disability, and their caregivers by providing the innovative answers, services, and support they need to achieve the greatest possible independence, dignity, and quality of life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $153k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $697k
- $250k+1 grant · $323k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES INC | $322,979 |
| PRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC | $142,992 |
| SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES | $119,809 |
| HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES | $108,644 |
| JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES | $82,698 |
| STILL WATERS ADULT DAY CENTER | $82,017 |
| SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY | $56,481 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES INDIANAPOLIS INC | $53,182 |
| TMP ENTERPRISES INC (DBA JOY'S HOUSE CARE AND COMMUNITY) | $51,263 |
| BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES | $44,373 |
| MORGAN COUNTY CONNECT | $37,700 |
| LITTLE REED DOOR CANCER AGENCY | $37,263 |
| HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES | $23,093 |
| A SENIOR RETREAT | $10,603 |
| JOHN BONER COMMUNITY CENTER | $9,120 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ILIndiana Legal Services Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +145%
HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $892k · revenue +58%- SSSHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $709k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- CACOORDINATED AGING SERVICE-MORGAN COUNTYone grant, 2017 · $33k
- HPHeritage Place of Indianapolis Incone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -14%
- IOINDIANAPOLIS OASISone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Providing seniors with services and programs to promote overall wellness.
To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.
Elderserve, inc. provides services to empower older adults to live indepeendently with dignity in louisville/jefferson county.
Eldercare services institute, llc provides a full-range of home and community based services for older adults and their caregivers.
We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.
At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…
To offer a broad range of community based and Home-Care Services designed to enable older adults to remain independent and active by living healthy lives.
To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…
Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…
To identify the needs of seniors and work to meet them, while treating all with dignity adn respect. encouraging others to do the same.
Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelby Senior Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Heritage Place of Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Indiana Legal Services Inc ↗
- Who funds PRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHELBY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BOONE COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TMP Enterprises Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds SYCAMORE REHABILITATION SERVICES HENDRICKS COUNTY ARC INC ↗
- Who funds The Villages of Indiana Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds Heritage Place of Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS OASIS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Second Helpings Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · St Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center Inc · St Vincent Health Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc?
Find your warmest path to Cicoa Aging & In-Home Solutions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.