Skip to content
Christus Health Northern Louisiana at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Christus Health Northern Louisiana

The corporation's mission shall be to "extend the healing ministry of jesus christ, consistent therewith, shall operate according to the doctrines, resolutions.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$26MEducation$855kHuman Services$48kCommunity Improvement$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kReligion$28kArts & Culture$27kPhilanthropy$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $464,336, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,235,389 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,771,053 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $395k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$235M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS Fdn Shreveport-Bossier$193,076
Northwestern State Univ$137,000
Louisiana Tech Univ$65,000
Northwestern State Univ Fdn Inc$30,000
Bossier Chamber Of Commerce$12,260
Shreveport - Bossier Sports Commission$10,000
LSU Hlth Sciences Fdn Shrvprt$10,000
Bossier Parish School Board$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Multi-Cultural DEV CTr: $8k → 13%Louisiana Family Services: $41k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 24 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
10

Total granted

$24M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

46%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $14M · revenue +78%
  • CF
    Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +83% · 39% of their budget
  • LC
    LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +301%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2.1M
  • CM
    CHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +68%
  • ML
    MARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY
    one grant, 2018 · $44k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lsu Health Sciences Center - Shreveport Faculty Group Practice

No board approved mission statement

Health
2
Lsu Health Sciences Building Foundation in Shreveport

All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.

Education
3
Louisiana State Medical Society

The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…

—
4
Ochsner Lsu Health System of North Louisiana

No board approved mission statement

Health
5
Louisiana State University School of Med in New Orleans Faculty Group Practice

The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence

Health
6
Louisiana State Medical Society Educational and Research Foundation

The primary purpose of the foundation is to engage in and carry out scientific research in the fields of medical science, medical economics, public health, sociology, and related areas for the benefit of the interested public, medical…

Health
7
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
8
Lsu Alumni Association

The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…

—
9
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc

Inspired by the vision of st. francis and in the tradition of the roman catholic church, we extend the healing ministry of jesus christ to god's people, especially those most in need. we call forth all who serve in this healthcare…

Health
10
Health Care Foundation of North Ms

Health care foundation of north mississippi is operated exclusively for the purpose of raising, receiving, and administering funds (for medical, scientific, educational and charitable purposes), to assist hospital and non-profit…

Health
11
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association Foundation Inc

The foundation serves as the philanthropic arm of lake charles memorial hospital, working to support and enhance the hospital's mission of providing compassionate care, community service and cutting-edge technology for the people of…

Health
12
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lsu in Shreveport Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The General Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $13,511,160 · HealthOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATIONTHE GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,112,540 · HealthTHE GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION+5 more: $747,634 · HealthHCA HEALTHCARE: $2,882,375 · OtherHCA HEALTHCAREChristus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier: $1,503,542 · OtherChristus Foundation Shreveport-BossierLOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $1,376,364 · OtherLOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INCALLEN CLINICAL SERVICES: $676,149 · OtherALLEN CLINICAL SERVICESEASTERN LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES: $649,027 · OtherEASTERN LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICESVERMILLION HEALTH SERVICES: $613,802 · OtherVERMILLION HEALTH SERVICESMETAIRIE PHYSICIANS SERVICES INC: $430,270 · Other+15 more: $962,560 · Other+15 moreLSU IN SHREVEPORT FOUNDATION INC: $478,333 · EducationNSU FOUNDATION INC: $335,666 · EducationBOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $144,000 · PhilanthropyLSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION IN SHREVEPORT: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $137,000 · Recreation & SportsLOUISIANA FAMILY SERVICES INC: $40,665 · Human ServicesHOPE CONNECTIONS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMULTI-CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesNORTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $41,000 · Community Improvement
Health$16,371,334Other$9,094,089Education$813,999Philanthropy$164,000Recreation & Sports$137,000Human Services$58,165Community Improvement$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $13,511,160 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChristus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier: $1,503,542 over 4y, 39% of budgetLOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $1,376,364 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetLSU IN SHREVEPORT FOUNDATION INC: $478,333 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetNSU FOUNDATION INC: $335,666 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetDavid Raines Community Health Center Inc: $324,900 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $219,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $144,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNATCHITOCHES CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $132,304 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY: $44,230 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLOUISIANA TROOPERS CHARITIES INC: $32,466 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS: $26,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION IN SHREVEPORT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSSIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12,260 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOPE CONNECTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMULTI-CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LSU IN SHREVEPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METAIRIE PHYSICIANS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NSU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds David Raines Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds NATCHITOCHES CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA TROOPERS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds LSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION IN SHREVEPORT ↗
  • Who funds BOSSIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTI-CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christus Health Centr…Community Foundation …Christus Health South…American Electric Pow…Willis-Knighton Medic…Grayson Foundation IncUnited Way of Northwe…Carolyn W & Charles T…Christus HealthBlue Cross & Blue Shi…Biomedical Research F…Enterprise Holdings F…
Christus Health Central LouisianaLA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christus Health Central Louisiana · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana · American Electric Power Foundation · Willis-Knighton Medical Center · Grayson Foundation Inc · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Christus Health · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christus Health Northern Louisiana funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christus Health Northern Louisiana. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christus Health Northern Louisiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home