· Private foundation
Christian Development Foundation Inc
Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k13 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GATHERING | $36,000 |
| HOPE START INTERNATIONAL | $24,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,800 |
| ONE LOVE MINISTRIES KAKA'AKO | $14,400 |
| CAPS PREGNANCY SERVICES | $12,500 |
| SONSHINE HAVEN | $12,000 |
| EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER | $8,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $5,000 |
| CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST | $3,000 |
| LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| CELEBRATION CENTER | $3,000 |
| LEAD TO SERVE | $2,500 |
| SUDAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $2,410 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $2,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–26, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
54 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2026, 38 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GATHERING10× · 2017–2026 · $407k · revenue +22%
- SHSONSHINE HAVEN INC10× · 2017–2026 · $202k · revenue +74% · 32% of their budget
- RIRADIUS INTERNATIONAL2× · 2022–2023 · $85k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- PCPACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +49%
- TCTHERAPY CENTER INC DBA CHALLENGE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue +27%
- CCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…
None
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Religious
The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…
To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations
Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.
Teach the ministry of christ
Religious
Supporing missionaries worldwide
Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edify and the most unlike its peers is Indian Hills Christian Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING ↗
- Who funds SONSHINE HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds HOPESTART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds RADIUS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds THERAPY CENTER INC DBA CHALLENGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds INDIAN HILLS CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
- Who funds URBAN YOUTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds HRS TRUE HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Branch College of Ministry ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · The San Diego Foundation · Servant Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Greater Horizons · Siebel Family Charitable Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The New Horizons Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christian Development Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Global Vision Outreach Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.