Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Christ Lutheran Foundation Inc

Perform religious, charitable and educational services and activities.

$216k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$590kEducation$217kFood & Nutrition$188kHealth$59kYouth Development$42kHuman Services$24kCrime & Legal$24k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $192,153 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $216,389 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,236 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $87k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH$86,556
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH DAY SCHOOL$32,458
ELCA WORLD HUNGER$21,639
CLC YOUTH MINISTRY$10,000
COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION (LIVING WATERS RANCH)$10,000
BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON$8,000
WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH LIVING$8,000
BREAD PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$8,000
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $12k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $10k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $8k → 22%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY INC: $8k → 22%FAITH MISSION & HELP CENTER: $13k → 14%HERE I AM ORPHAN MINISTRIES INC: $2k → 14%BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TX: $10k → 14%BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON: $8k → 14%BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TX: $8k → 14%BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TX: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+57%

Still filing today

80%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTHY LIVING ASSOCIA
    3× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +15%
  • CT
    COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +4%
  • BM
    BRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • FM
    FAITH MISSION & HELP CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +44%
  • TG
    TEXAS-LOUISIANA GULF COAST SYNOD OUTDOOR & RETREAT MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • BP
    BRENHAM PREGNANCY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas

To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.

Religion
2
Border Missions

We distribute food, clothing, and toiletry items to the poor and needy along the TX-Mexico Border as well as ministering to their spiritual needs through services, health programs, and other humanitarian efforts.

Religion
3
Burkburnett Grace Ministries Inc

Provide monetary assistance to qualified individuals and households to assist with payment of rent, utilities, and medicine as well as provide food from a community supported food pantry. we serve ten towns in texas and oklahoma.

Human Services
4
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
5
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
7
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
8
First Baptist Denton Ministry Center

The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…

Health
9
Brazos Church Pantry Inc

Collection of food to provide to needy people in brazos, county, texas

10
Manna of Life Ministries of Texas Inc

Charitable, religious and/or educational purposes. preach and teach the gospel, as well as, supply missionaries with bibles, blankets and food. manna also gives to the poor that their needs might be met.

Religion
11
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
12
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Mission & Help Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is S O S Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH — $750,054 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCHEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA — $108,221 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICABREAD PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $48,000 · Other+3 more — $32,000 · OtherHospice Brazos Valley Inc — $37,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS — $30,000 · Human ServicesFAITH MISSION & HELP CENTER INC — $13,000 · Human Services+1 more — $2,400 · Human ServicesCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION — $32,000 · ReligionCHRIST LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Religion+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionWASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTHY LIVING ASSOCIA — $32,182 · Food & NutritionCASA for Kids of South Central Texas Inc — $24,027 · Housing & ShelterADAM'S ANGELS MINISTRY — $18,000 · HealthBRENHAM PREGNANCY CENTER — $4,244 · HealthBRENHAM GAMECHANGERS INC — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$938,275Human Services$82,400Religion$43,000Food & Nutrition$32,182Housing & Shelter$24,027Health$22,244Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREAD PARTNERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $48,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc — $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTHY LIVING ASSOCIA — $32,182 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION — $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE MINISTRY OF BURTON TEXAS — $30,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCASA for Kids of South Central Texas Inc — $24,027 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMIRACLE FARM INC — $21,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetADAM'S ANGELS MINISTRY — $18,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFAITH MISSION & HELP CENTER INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHRIST LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBRENHAM PREGNANCY CENTER — $4,244 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBRENHAM GAMECHANGERS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHere I Am Orphan Ministries Inc — $2,400 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetS O S Ministries INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BetsWest FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BetsWest Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Christ Lutheran Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christ Lutheran Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Christ Lutheran Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph