Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Christ Healing Institute

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$152kFood & Nutrition$61kEducation$61kHealth$31kPublic Benefit$22kHuman Services$18kYouth Development$5kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$850
Median grant
2
States reached
$447k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG DEAL MINISTRIES$2,450
RESTORATION CHURCH$1,050
TRINITY CHURCH$1,000
STORM ELITE BOOSTER CLUB$870
PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS$850
CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER$600
PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD$600
COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER$550
RON PAUL INSTITUTE$510
CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE$350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $7k → 11%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $6k → 11%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $6k → 11%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $350 → 11%PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS: $21k → 14%PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS: $17k → 14%PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS: $850 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$353k · 17 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -78% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$353k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-78%

Still filing today

41%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +11%
  • PM
    PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +22%
  • PC
    PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • PC
    PRESCOTT COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AF
    AZ FOOD BANK NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
2
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

3
Casa Support Council for Pima County in

Provide emotional and physical support to children who are or have been involved in the court appointed special advocate (casa) program in pima county, arizona.

Human Services
4
Christian Academy of Prescott Inc

Non-profit christian education. cap's foremost goal, as a school, is to build competence in students through excellence in all academic disciplines and to develop a life long desire for learning. in addition to academics, cap endeavors to…

5
Christian Counseling Services Assistance Fund Az
Human Services
6
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
7
Laced With Love

To provide resources to children in AZ DCS Custody

Human Services
8
Arizonans for Children Inc

Arizonans for children inc. exists to faciliate opportunities and provide effective solutions to improve and stabilize the fragile lives of foster children

Human Services
9
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
10
Arizona Baptist Children's Services

To provide hope and care to hurting children and families through christ centered ministries

Human Services
11
Compass Training Center Az
Education
12
Az Community Impact

The vision of AZCI is to transform communities by providing pathways to sustainability for families in need. The mission of AZCI is to leverage resources to meet the needs of individuals and families facing hardship. AZCI complements and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Christian School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Parker Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRINITY CHURCH — $76,750 · OtherTRINITY CHURCHMOUNTAIN TOP CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP — $41,216 · OtherMOUNTAIN TOP CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER — $22,426 · OtherCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTERRON PAUL INSTITUTE — $22,017 · OtherRON PAUL INSTITUTEPROJECT VERITAS — $16,116 · OtherPROJECT VERITASIndividual grant recipient — $14,879 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESTORATION CHURCH INC — $9,300 · Other+13 more — $24,021 · Other+13 moreTRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $55,000 · EducationTRINITY CHRISTIAN …Prescott Classical Academy Inc — $5,000 · EducationPrescott Classical…PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS — $38,050 · Human ServicesPRESCOTT MEALS ON…CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC — $18,350 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN FAMILY …PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC — $18,850 · Food & NutritionYAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC — $2,000 · HealthParker Project Inc — $1,000 · HealthAZ HUSKY RESCUE — $1,000 · Animals
Other$226,725Education$60,000Human Services$56,400Food & Nutrition$18,850Youth Development$5,000Health$3,000Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS — $38,050 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC — $18,850 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC — $18,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPrescott Classical Academy Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetYAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAZ HUSKY RESCUE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetParker Project Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC
  • Who funds Prescott Classical Academy Inc
  • Who funds YAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds AZ HUSKY RESCUE
  • Who funds Parker Project Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Jw Kieckhefer Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Christ Healing Institute funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christ Healing Institute?

    Find your warmest path to Christ Healing Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph