Skip to content

Oregon · Public charity

Choosing Kindness Foundation

To spread kindness and to increase the well-being and happiness of individuals, organizations, and communities by providing kindness grants and supporting this work in schools, workplaces, social services, and public safety. To support social justice, poverty alleviation, charitable assistance, environmental sustainablity, and projects…

$383k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$261k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$250,034
Largest grant, FY2025
$250,034
Organizations funded a year
3 to 21
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$90k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Choosing Kindness Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Crime & LegalPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$261k0%
FY20243$487k33%
FY20234$346k50%
FY202214$744k93%
FY202121$213kn/a
90% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$726kHealth$496kEducation$318kYouth Development$74kCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$32kArts & Culture$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
MS
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kindful Restoration$934,3423100%
I Thrive Incorporated$495,7193n/a
Breakthrough Miami Inc$137,68032%
Stepn2ourlane Inc$45,7501n/a
Miami Non Stop Dance$29,3001n/a
Richmond County Board of Education$28,0001n/a
Getting Out by Going In$15,34411%
Eugene School District 4J$12,4761n/a
Projectcamp$9,77511%
Risk Club$7,5751n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Choosing Kindness Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Kindful Restoration$934,3423100%
I Thrive Incorporated$495,7193n/a
Breakthrough Miami Inc$137,68032%
Stepn2ourlane Inc$45,7501n/a
Miami Non Stop Dance$29,3001n/a
Richmond County Board of Education$28,0001n/a
Getting Out by Going In$15,34411%
Eugene School District 4J$12,4761n/a
Projectcamp$9,77511%
Risk Club$7,5751n/a
Pershing Elementary School PTO$6,5001n/a
Pocomoke Elementary School$6,5001n/a

Plus 25 recipients with no EIN on record ($321k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Choosing Kindness Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Choosing Kindness Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Choosing Kindness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Choosing Kindness Foundation

How much does Choosing Kindness Foundation give?
Choosing Kindness Foundation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $261,034, out of $383,289 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 21 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Choosing Kindness Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (41%), Health (28%), Education (18%).
Who are Choosing Kindness Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Kindful Restoration ($934k), I Thrive Incorporated ($496k), Breakthrough Miami Inc ($138k).
Does Choosing Kindness Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Choosing Kindness Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Choosing Kindness Foundation based?
Choosing Kindness Foundation is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Choosing Kindness’ filings →

More from the funding graph