Skip to content

Nevada · Nonprofit

GETTING OUT BY GOING IN

GETTING OUT BY GOING IN (Nevada) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,630 to it, the largest being Bob Barker Foundation Inc ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$83k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$46k
Net assets
$214k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Getting Out by Going In does

Mission

To enable men, women and children in prisons and jails with tools for positive decision making for their successful return to society.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. There have been more than 30,000 graduates of Getting Out by Going In. Programming and gogi studies since 2005. We have responded with handwritten letters to 200 incoming letters each week since 2007. We hold monthly workshops with hundreds of prisoners attending and have waiting lists for all gogi appearances.

    $73,000 spent$82,687 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $73,000.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($578k) Expenses 100 ($570k) Net assets 100 ($176k)2018 Revenue 227 ($1.3M) Expenses 194 ($1.1M) Net assets 218 ($384k)2019 Revenue 258 ($1.5M) Expenses 310 ($1.8M) Net assets 61 ($108k)2020 Revenue 99 ($575k) Expenses 36 ($205k) Net assets 272 ($478k)2021 Revenue 186 ($1.1M) Expenses 42 ($240k) Net assets 612 ($1.1M)2022 Revenue 33 ($193k) Expenses 70 ($397k) Net assets 224 ($394k)2023 Revenue 85 ($494k) Expenses 82 ($467k) Net assets 239 ($420k)2024 Revenue 59 ($339k) Expenses 49 ($280k) Net assets 272 ($479k)2025 Revenue 14 ($83k) Expenses 61 ($347k) Net assets 122 ($214k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (14)Expenses (61)Net assets (122)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $3.1M to $394k (−87%).

$294k
$1.0M
$2.1M
$2.4M
$3.1M
$394k
$420k
$479k
$214k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 88% · 2018 95% · 2019 96% · 2020 92% · 2021 94% · 2022 54% · 2023 95% · 2024 91% · 2025 93%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of GETTING OUT BY GOING IN’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$8k
’17
$208k
’18
−$276k
’19
$370k
’20
$834k
’21
−$204k
’22
$27k
’23
$58k
’24
−$265k
’25
4.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201820192020202120222023
Listed1111111
Joined·······
No longer listed·······
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $85 → $55.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
3
2
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GETTING OUT BY GOING IN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GETTING OUT BY GOING IN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

34% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GETTING OUT BY GOING IN.

66%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 60% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GETTING OUT BY GOING IN draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Nevada, across 2 states in all.

OR
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $286 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GETTING OUT BY GOING IN's revenue fell 86% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−320% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.1mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−22% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,360 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like GETTING OUT BY GOING IN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

21% of spending goes to programs.

Program 21%Management 0%Fundraising 79%

Governance

1
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GETTING OUT BY GOING IN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GETTING OUT BY GOING IN?
GETTING OUT BY GOING IN (Nevada) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,630 to it, the largest being Bob Barker Foundation Inc ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GETTING OUT BY GOING IN have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $45,630 in grants to GETTING OUT BY GOING IN, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GETTING OUT BY GOING IN?
Bob Barker Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GETTING OUT BY GOING IN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Getting Out by Going In →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing