· Public charity
Choice2020
The specific purpose of this organization is to research, collect, aggregate and disseminate critical insights into the workings of the california educational system and the improvements that school choice would confer upon it.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $97k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VINEYARD OUTREACH AMERICA | $500,000 |
| MARINERS CHURCH | $97,306 |
| GODSPEAK CALVARY CHAPEL | $10,000 |
| THE GROVE COMMUNITY CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CALVARY CHAPEL CHINO HILLS | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2020.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2020, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
Play a game based on Choice2020’s filings →