Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chipstone Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$429k
Granted FY2023
16
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.5MArts & Culture$150kReligion$20kHealth$14kCommunity Improvement$10kEnvironment$8kFood & Nutrition$4kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k14 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW FOUNDATION, INC.$375,000
MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FUND$13,199
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH$6,000
HISTORIC INDIAN AGENCY HOUSE$5,720
FOX POINT LUTHERN CHURCH$5,000
UWM FOUNDATION$3,000
STRAWBERY BANKE$2,500
FOX POINT FOUNDATION$2,500
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$2,500
FRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER$2,000
PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,500
MIAD, MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN$1,000
MORRIS ARBORETUM UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$1,000
HAHN'S PEAK AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$250
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+113%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +29%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue +180%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHAZEN MUSEUM OF ART, UW MADISON
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • OS
    OLD SALEM MUSEUMS & GARDENS - MESDA
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
  • NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
4
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
5
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Smithsonian Institution

*increase and diffusion of knowledge* is the mission set forth by james smithson. the smithsonian endeavors to shape the future by preserving our heritage, discovering new knowledge, and sharing our resources with the world.

Arts & Culture
8
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
9
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
10
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
11
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Richard Hampton Jenrette Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,447,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+3 more: $37,000 · EducationCHAZEN MUSEUM OF ART, UW MADISON: $60,000 · OtherCHAZEN MUSEU…OLD SALEM MUSEUMS & GARDENS - MESDA: $24,000 · OtherOLD SALEM MU…FOX POINT LUTHERN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherFOX POINT LU…MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FUND: $13,199 · OtherMICHIGAN TEC…STRAWBERY BANKE: $12,500 · OtherSTRAWBERY BA…FOX POINT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $7,500 · Other+14 more: $46,853 · Other+14 moreNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureIndigo Arts Alliance: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & CulturePENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $6,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Environment
Education$1,484,500Other$189,052Arts & Culture$36,500Health$6,000Environment$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $1,447,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIndigo Arts Alliance: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHaystack Mountain School of Crafts: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD HAMPTON JENRETTE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Indigo Arts Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Haystack Mountain School of Crafts ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD HAMPTON JENRETTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chipstone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chipstone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $425k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chipstone’s filings →

More from the funding graph