Loading…
· Public charity
CHINESE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE
To promote social welfare by making health services more accessible to the chinese community.
$200k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
1
Communities
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$718kHealth$135kEducation$30kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$335k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
asianhealthy
2019
adventurebetterhealthy
2020
livingadventurebetterimmigranthealthy
2021
covidpandemiceducation
2022
education
2023
livebettereducation
2024
linelivebettereducation
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
- APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$65,000
- SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY$50,000
- WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL$20,000
- COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO$20,000
- CHINATOWN YMCA$17,120
- CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER$9,000
- SAN FRANCISCO LIFE LINE$6,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $718k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
3
Total granted
$1.1M
$34k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+70%
+37%
Still filing today
92%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY5× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +70%
- YMYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO7× · 2018–2024 · $118k · revenue +26%
- CYCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO6× · 2019–2024 · $91k · revenue +158%
Funded once
- DDANCE4HEALINGone grant, 2023 · $15k
- CCCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +37%
- GPGRACE PACIFIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATESone grant, 2021 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
—
2
Chinese Community Health Resource
CCHRC's mission is to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate health education and information to the members of the community, and to collaborate with other community organizations to gather and disseminate health information to…
Health
3
Oakland Chinatown Improvement Council
Our mission is to empower and unite the vibrant Chinatown community through social, cultural, and economic development, improving the quality of life for all residents. We achieve this by preserving heritage, promoting inclusivity, and…
Community Improvement
4
Asian American Center of Santa Clara
The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…
Human Services
5
Chinese Culture Foundation of San
To elevate underserved communities and gives voice to equality through education and contemporary art.
Arts & Culture
6
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness
Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy & needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.
Health
7
Oakland Chinatown Chamber of Commerce Inc
The mission of Oakland Chinatown Chamber of Commerce is to promote and advocate for business trade in Oakland Chinatown.
—
8
Chinatown Community Childrens Center
Our mission is to prepare children for Kindergarten and beyond by promoting educational achievement, ensuring household economic stability and strengthening cultural identity. We fulfill our mission by operating 2 core programs the child…
Human Services
9
Asian Health Services
To serve and advocate for the medically underserved, including the immigrant and refugee asian community, and to ensure equal access to health care services regardless of income, insurance status, language, or culture.
Health
10
Unitedly
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Human Services
11
Children's Council of San Francisco
Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.
Human Services
12
National Asian Pacific Center On Aging
Napca's mission is to preserve and promote the dignity, well-being, and quality of life of asian americans, native hawaiians, and pacific islanders (aanhpis) as they age.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinatown Community Development Center and the most unlike its peers is Womens Division Christian Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$717,920Other$335,431Health$134,555Education$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WOMENS DIVISION CHRISTIAN SERVICE GUM MOON RESIDENCE HALL ↗
- Who funds CHINESE NEWCOMERS SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
- Who funds DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Asian Pacific FundCA26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Asian Pacific Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Robert J Louie Memorial Fund · United Way of the Bay Area · Crankstart Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · San Francisco Community Agencies · San Francisco Association of Realtors · Shp Christian Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CHINESE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273429376 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Chinese Community Health Care?
Find your warmest path to Chinese Community Health Care through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines