Skip to content

· Public charity

Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc

Chinese christian herald crusades (cchc) is a faith based 501(c)3 organization that has been offering a wide array of community services.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$769kInternational$612kHuman Services$79kArts & Culture$13kHealth$13k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $59,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $284,663 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $225,563 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$59,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Culture REgeneration Research Society$59,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC: $2k → 17%HERALD FOUNDATION: $350k → 14%HERALD FOUNDATION: $137k → 14%HERALD FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $35k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $14k to organizations and $21k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$35k · 100% · 1 grant · 1 person

Stated purpose: Love for Taiwan · Pao Hsing Lin

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 6 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PRESENCE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +33%
  • GL
    GOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • KC
    KAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $48k
  • KI
    K-PACT INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • ST
    SIU T CHU
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission to the Orient

The organization is a missionary sending/sponsoring organizations that engage in Christian evangelism and training leaders for the churches in SE Asia

—
2
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
3
Chinese Gospel Broadcasting Center Inc

Religious broadcasting services to involve christians in professional and media fields to join force in the production of gospel programs for radio and

Arts & Culture
4
Korean Christian Broadcasting System

None

Arts & Culture
5
Culturebound Inc

The organizations mission is to teach cross cultural ministry principles & skills specifically for the international advancement of christian ministry. we do this by way of seminars, internet teaching, and publishing. our audience serves…

Religion
6
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
7
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
8
Chinese Overseas Christian Mission Inc

An evangelical interdenominational missionary society dedicated to reaching chinese for christ.

Religion
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
10
Kingdom Global Ministries

Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.

Religion
11
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
12
Reach Asia Ministries Inc

Reach asia ministries seeks to make god famous among the unreached peoples of asia by training and supporting indigenous leaders. ministry activities include evangelism, church planting, equipping pastors and church leaders, and at-risk…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for All Abilities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Golden Lampstand Association Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HERALD FOUNDATION: $686,400 · OtherHERALD FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+12 more: $38,449 · OtherHERALD FOUNDATION: $587,000 · Human ServicesHERALD FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesCULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA: $59,100 · ReligionK-PACT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · ReligionGOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC: $10,000 · ReligionPRESENCE: $13,000 · EducationHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 · HealthLOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC: $2,755 · HealthKAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$772,849Human Services$589,000Religion$94,100Education$13,000Health$12,755Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERALD FOUNDATION: $587,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetK-PACT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetPRESENCE: $13,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetGOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC: $2,755 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERALD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA ↗
  • Who funds K-PACT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PRESENCE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chinese Christian Herald Crusades’ filings →

    More from the funding graph