Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc

Chinese christian herald crusades (cchc) is a faith based 501(c)3 organization that has been offering a wide array of community services.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$769kInternational$612kHuman Services$79kArts & Culture$13kHealth$13k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $59,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $284,663 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $225,563 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$59,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Culture REgeneration Research Society$59,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC: $2k → 17%HERALD FOUNDATION: $350k → 14%HERALD FOUNDATION: $137k → 14%HERALD FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $35k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $14k to organizations and $21k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$35k · 100% · 1 grant · 1 person

Stated purpose: Love for Taiwan · Pao Hsing Lin

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 6 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PRESENCE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $13k · revenue +52%
  • GL
    GOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • KC
    KAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $48k
  • KI
    K-PACT INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • ST
    SIU T CHU
    one grant, 2018 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean Christian Broadcasting System

None

Arts & Culture
2
Christian Mission to the Orient

The organization is a missionary sending/sponsoring organizations that engage in Christian evangelism and training leaders for the churches in SE Asia

3
Dualreach

Dualreach furthers the worldwide efforts of the christian church by partnering with other ministries & churches in evangelism ministries.

Religion
4
Christian Radio International Inc

Provide inspirational programming in various languages domestically and abroad via satellite, cable, internet, radio local am, fm and television mediums.

Religion
5
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

6
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
7
Kingdom Global Ministries

Christian services including missions efforts, humanitarian aide, mentoring/discipleship, establishment and covering of churches, licensing/ordaining ministers, pastoral support, all domestically and internationally.

Religion
8
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

9
Reach Ministries International

Rmi's activities include evangelism, discipleship, leadership training & other activities to spread the christian gospel in asia.

Religion
10
Reach Asia Ministries Inc

Reach asia ministries seeks to make god famous among the unreached peoples of asia by training and supporting indigenous leaders. ministry activities include evangelism, church planting, equipping pastors and church leaders, and at-risk…

Religion
11
Harvest Connection

Bring connection to churches for ministry and education in local and global mission

Religion
12
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Herald Christian Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Golden Lampstand Association Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HERALD FOUNDATION — $686,400 · OtherHERALD FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+12 more — $38,449 · OtherHERALD FOUNDATION — $587,000 · Human ServicesHERALD FOUNDATION+1 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesCULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA — $59,100 · ReligionK-PACT INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 · ReligionGOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC — $10,000 · ReligionPRESENCE — $13,000 · EducationHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 · HealthLOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC — $2,755 · HealthKAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$772,849Human Services$589,000Religion$94,100Education$13,000Health$12,755Arts & Culture$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHERALD FOUNDATION — $587,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetK-PACT INTERNATIONAL — $25,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetPRESENCE — $13,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC — $10,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC — $2,755 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERALD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CULTURE REGENERATION RESEARCH SOCIETY USA
  • Who funds K-PACT INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds PRESENCE
  • Who funds HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds GOLDEN LAMPSTAND ASSOCIATION US INC
  • Who funds KAIROS COMMUNICATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds LOWER EASTSIDE SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ALL ABILITIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph