Skip to content

· Private foundation

Children's Chance for Life

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$906kInternational$540kFood & Nutrition$148kEducation$131kHealth$66kHousing & Shelter$13kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$3k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOODROOTS NORTHWEST$50,000
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$30,000
FAMILY LITERACY PROJECT NPC$30,000
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH$30,000
GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION$15,000
PADRINO CHILDRENS FUND$10,000
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,546
BIG GIVE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%TRINITY MISSIONS INC: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $2k → 14%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PADRINO CHILDERN'S FUND: $5k → 11%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OR
IN
CA
CO
AZ
AR
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Children's Chance for Life’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 53%.

Children's Chance for Lifelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 11 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
21

Total granted

$1.5M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+63%

Still filing today

55%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationReligionFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +33%
  • CE
    CABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $246k · revenue +78%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $185k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • FB
    FELLOW BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $82k
  • FL
    FAMILY LITERACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +69%
  • IM
    INSPIRE MEXICO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
2
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
3
Catherines Childrens Home

Help transform the lives of abandoned special needs and medically fragile children in baja california, mexico

Human Services
4
Luz Para El Futuro

Breaking the cycle of poverty in Guatemala through education of impoverished children through education.

International
5
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
6
Feed the Hungry San Miguel Inc

Fthsm is a non-governmental organization that raises funds for feed the hungry, a.c. a mexican not-for-profit corporation which provides free meals for the poor of san miguel de allende, gto, mexico.

Food & Nutrition
7
Hope Without Boundaries

Charity work in Tijuana, Mexico

International
8
Forward Edge International

Our vision is to see people around the world overcome spiritual and material poverty through jesus christ.

International
9
Child Family Health International

Child Family Health International is dedicated to transformative Global Health Education programs, research, and thought leadership emphasizing community leadership, global citizenship, and ethical engagement.

International
10
Feeding Hungry Families

The Organization supports programs that help needy families in third-world countries by providing food, clothing and medical care.

Religion
11
Holiness in Mexico

Bringing the Good News of Jesus Christ to Latin America to help relieve the suffering of those in need. Teaching the Word of God and distributing Bibles Building churches and establishing Bible believing fellowships across Latin America

—
12
Community Food Bank Inc

To ensure our communities are healthy and hunger-free today, tomorrow, and always.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Give. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $561,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHFAMILY LITERACY PROJECT NPC: $120,000 · OtherFAMILY LITERACY PROJECT NPCFELLOW BIBLE CHURCH: $82,000 · OtherFELLOW BIBLE CHURCH+18 more: $110,000 · Other+18 moreMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $313,050 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONALFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $185,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INCINSPIRE MEXICO FOUNDATION: $27,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalCABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC: $246,000 · ReligionCABO ENGLISH CH…GoodRoots Northwest: $50,000 · Food & NutritionPADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $7,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY LITERACY CENTER: $30,000 · EducationCascade Christian Schools: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION: $27,300 · HealthINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,046 · Philanthropy
Other$873,000International$530,050Religion$246,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Human Services$46,000Education$33,000Health$27,300Philanthropy$5,046

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $313,050 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC: $246,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $185,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetFAMILY LITERACY CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION: $27,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,046 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCascade Christian Schools: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG GIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CABO ENGLISH CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds GoodRoots Northwest ↗
  • Who funds PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRE MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSE ON BROADWAY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Cascade Christian Schools ↗
  • Who funds BIG GIVE ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY MISSIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Children's Chance for Life funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Children's Chance for Life. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Children's Chance for Life’s filings →

More from the funding graph