Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Child First Inc

Child first helps to heal and protect children and families from the devastating effects of trauma and chronic stress by fostering the development of strong, nurturing, caregiver-child relationships, promoting adult capacity, and connecting families with services.

$3.7M
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$1.6MEducation$707kPhilanthropy$702k
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $1,569,648 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,745,074 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,175,426 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$1,569,648
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$1,569,648
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AID INC: $450k → 9%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INC: $221k → 11%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AID INC: $219k → 9%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN INC: $116k → 11%CHILD GUIDANCE FOR CENTRAL CONNECTICUT: $438k → 12%CHILD GUIDANCE FOR CENTRAL CONNECTICUT: $185k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 8 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+3%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AID INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $669k · revenue +6%
  • TC
    The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital
    2× · 2017–2018 · $640k · revenue +78%
  • CG
    COMMUNITY GUIDANCE CLINIC FOR CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $623k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • NP
    NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $1.6M · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hospital of Central Connecticut

The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
The Child and Family Guidance Center Inc

The child and family guidance center (cfgc) is a community-based center that provides therapeutic, prevention, early intervention as well as support services to children and families in fairfield county ct. since 1925, cfgc has provided…

Human Services
3
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

4
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
5
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
Natchaug Hospital Inc

The mission of Natchaug Hospital is to provide a continuum of accessible, community-based services for those living with psychiatric illness and chemical dependency or emotional and related educational disabilities, with a commitment to…

Health
7
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
8
Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital

Upper connecticut valley hospital strives to improve the well-being of the rural communities it serves by promoting health and assuring access to quality care.

Health
9
Community Clinic Inc

Empower patients to partner with staff for an unparalleled healthcare experience through integrated primary care services teams in a learning environment. we deliver high quality, affordable care to every patient during all stages of life.

Health
10
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
11
Collaborative Family Health Care Coalition Inc

Cfha supports healthcare professionals in integrating physical and behavioral health.

Health
12
Children's Center

Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community and Family Servicesinc and the most unlike its peers is The Intercommunity Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $1,569,648 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIPThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospital — $640,214 · HealthThe Charlotte Hungerford HospitalWHEELER CLINIC INC — $343,200 · HealthWHEELER CLINIC INCFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AID INC — $668,612 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AID INCCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CLINIC FOR CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC — $622,884 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CLINIC FOR…THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $337,062 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND …LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY PARENT CHILD RESOURCE CENTER — $706,581 · OtherLOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY P…UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $610,208 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAM…THE INTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $702,131 · PhilanthropyTHE INTERCOM…
Health$2,553,062Human Services$1,628,558Other$1,316,789Philanthropy$702,131

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $1,569,648 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE INTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $702,131 over 2y, 100% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AID INC — $668,612 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospital — $640,214 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CLINIC FOR CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC — $622,884 over 2y, 16% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $610,208 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWHEELER CLINIC INC — $343,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $337,062 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Child First Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 39%
  • The Village for Families and Children50% of income from government
  • Wheeler Clinic Inc47% of income from government
  • Community Guidance Clinic for Central Connecticut Inc39% of income from government
  • Family and Children's Aid Inc36% of income from government
  • United Community and Family Servicesinc29% of income from government
  • The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Child First Inc?

Find your warmest path to Child First Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph