Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chesterman Family Foundation Co Kenneth W Chesterman

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$120kInternational$87kHuman Services$50kEducation$43kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Eden Mission$8,000
CSRM - World Outreach Center$5,000
New Song Church$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
New Hope Uganda$2,000
Christ Episcopal church$2,000
Samaritan's Purse$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Patrick Henry Family Services: $3k → 20%Patrick Henry Family Services: $2k → 20%Patrick Henry Family Service: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
SD
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 17 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$395k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+153%

Still filing today

41%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EDEN MISSION INC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $32k · revenue +163%
  • LO
    Least of These Ministry
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +149%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    7× · 2020–2026 · $17k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • LD
    LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +153%
  • CC
    CAMPUS CHRUSADE FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • C
    CSRM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Association of Certified Biblical

Training & certification of christian biblical counselors

—
4
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
5
Euthus Ministries
Human Services
6
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
7
Boston Center for Biblical Counseling
Philanthropy
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Eden Theological Seminary

Eden theological seminary is called to strengthen the life of the church by educating women and men for ministry, enlivening critical reflection on faith and supporting bold christian dicipleship.

Education
10
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
11
Caring Counseling Ministries

Biblical family counseling

Human Services
12
Pacific Island Ministries

To help fulfill the great commission as found in Matthew 28:19-20, the equipping of God's people for works of service, particularly in Papua New Guinea.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bethel University; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCSRM - World Outreach Center: $43,500 · OtherCSRM - World Outreach CenterNEW SONG CHURCH: $39,500 · OtherNEW SONG CHURCHEFCA International Mission: $33,000 · OtherEFCA International MissionEDEN MISSION INC: $32,000 · OtherEDEN MISSION INCNew Hope Uganda: $22,500 · OtherNew Hope UgandaIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHMinn Assemblies of God: $16,000 · OtherCampus Crusade For Christ: $12,000 · Other+9 more: $30,000 · Other+9 moreBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $31,500 · EducationBETHEL UNIV…CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA …Least of These Ministry: $18,500 · ReligionLeast of …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $16,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN…BAPTIST EVANGELISTIC MISSIONARY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 · ReligionBAPTIST E…ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesPATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMAYFIELD COUNSELING CENTERS: $1,000 · Health
Other$328,000Education$42,500Religion$38,000Human Services$22,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDEN MISSION INC: $32,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY: $31,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeast of These Ministry: $18,500 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYFIELD COUNSELING CENTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDEN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Least of These Ministry ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PATRICK HENRY FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST EVANGELISTIC MISSIONARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYFIELD COUNSELING CENTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chesterman Family Foundation Co Kenneth W Chesterman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chesterman Family Foundation Co Kenneth W Chesterman. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chesterman Family Foundation Co Kenneth W Chesterman’s filings →

More from the funding graph