Skip to content
Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$204kFood & Nutrition$79kCommunity Improvement$62kReligion$24kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$13kHealth$12kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$6,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$19,000
KOREAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WA STATE$12,000
HUNGER COALITION$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,500
UNITED SUICIDE SURVIVORS INTERNATIONAL$8,000
YOUTH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SANITY aka YES$6,500
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF SAN MATEO$6,000
PAGE AHEAD CHILDREN'S LITERACY PROGRAM$5,000
MACALESTER COLLEGE$5,000
FEED WASHINGTON$4,000
NATIONAL SPEAKERS ASSOCIATION NW CHAPTER$3,500
SHOSHONE PROJECT$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BENEVOLENCE AND BEYOND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTREPID EVENTS INC: $5k → 7%LARKIN STREET YOUTH: $3k → 10%ASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE: $4k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE: $2k → 9%ALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 12 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
34

Total granted

$318k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

75%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    Urban Impact
    4× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +107%
  • MACALESTER COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +69%
  • PA
    PAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TS
    THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +108%
  • IA
    ITS ALL BIGGER THAN ME MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
2
United Territories of Pacific Islanders Washington-Utopia Wa

We are actively replacing systems of oppression with ecosystems of care and safety for all our communities through Black and Brown organizing, prioritizing land and bodily autonomy, and reclaiming our cultural narratives.

Human Services
3
The Why Not Us Foundation

In 2013, we learned of a problem. Our farming industry and our lands were slowly disappearing from existence. So we set out to make a difference & change the world. Today, we are steps away from embarking on an incredible journey of…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Seattle Chapter American Institute of Archite

We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.

—
5
Iaf Northwest

In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…

Community Improvement
6
Seattle Good Business Network Dba Good Business Network of Washington

Seattle Good Business Network connects and inspires people to buy, produce, and invest locally, so that everyone has a meaningful stake in the local economy.

Community Improvement
7
Washington Research Foundation
Health
8
Seattle University Foundation

Fundraising activities to support Seattle University

—
9
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
10
The Urbanist Fund

Support Public Interest Journalism in Washington State

Public Benefit
11
Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility

Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility engages the community to create a healthy, just, peaceful and sustainable world. We take on the gravest current threats to human health and survival -- nuclear weapons, economic inequity, and…

International
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forterra Nw; the most unlike its peers is Black Owned Business Excellence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
13/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $117,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUNDMACALESTER COLLEGE: $29,600 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGEPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $26,500 · EducationPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGMSTELLA SCHOLA PTO: $13,000 · EducationSTELLA SCHOLA PTOTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $11,000 · EducationTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCESSports in Schools: $7,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKOREAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WA STATE: $12,000 · OtherKOREAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WA STAT…ITS ALL BIGGER THAN ME MINISTRY: $9,500 · OtherITS ALL BIGGER THAN ME MINISTRYIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY: $8,000 · OtherPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherYOUTH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SANITY aka YES: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,200 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF SAN MATEO: $6,000 · Other+24 more: $52,800 · Other+24 moreBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $43,000 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUNTY H…FEED WASHINGTON: $22,000 · Food & NutritionFEED WASHINGTONMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK …+1 more: $600 · Food & NutritionUrban Impact: $31,500 · ReligionASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $6,000 · Human ServicesINTREPID EVENTS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services: $2,500 · Human ServicesALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO: $2,000 · Human ServicesBlack Owned Business Excellence: $6,500 · Community ImprovementChinatown International District Business Improvement Area: $5,000 · Community ImprovementShoshone Project Inc: $3,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED SUICIDE SURVIVORS INTERNATIONAL INC: $8,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,000 · Health
Education$204,100Other$150,500Food & Nutrition$69,600Religion$31,500Human Services$15,500Community Improvement$14,500Health$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $117,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $43,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUrban Impact: $31,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $29,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $26,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFEED WASHINGTON: $22,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetSTELLA SCHOLA PTO: $13,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSports in Schools: $7,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBlack Owned Business Excellence: $6,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTREPID EVENTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetChinatown International District Business Improvement Area: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROBERT CHINN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ASIAN WEEKLY FOUNDATION: $3,150 over 2y, 21% of budgetShoshone Project Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWomens Funding Alliance: $2,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTHER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALIMENTANDO AL PUEBLO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH RELIEF: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYouth for Environmental Sanity: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROSE INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TATTER BLUE ARCHIVES INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Doctor Yum Project: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Credit Unions in the …The Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chensteino'Malleysven’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home