· Private foundation
Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND | $19,000 |
| KOREAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WA STATE | $12,000 |
| HUNGER COALITION | $9,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,500 |
| UNITED SUICIDE SURVIVORS INTERNATIONAL | $8,000 |
| YOUTH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SANITY aka YES | $6,500 |
| CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF SAN MATEO | $6,000 |
| PAGE AHEAD CHILDREN'S LITERACY PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| MACALESTER COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| FEED WASHINGTON | $4,000 |
| NATIONAL SPEAKERS ASSOCIATION NW CHAPTER | $3,500 |
| SHOSHONE PROJECT | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| BENEVOLENCE AND BEYOND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UIUrban Impact4× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +107%
MACALESTER COLLEGE6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +69%- PAPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $20k
- TSTHE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +108%
- IAITS ALL BIGGER THAN ME MINISTRYone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.
We are actively replacing systems of oppression with ecosystems of care and safety for all our communities through Black and Brown organizing, prioritizing land and bodily autonomy, and reclaiming our cultural narratives.
In 2013, we learned of a problem. Our farming industry and our lands were slowly disappearing from existence. So we set out to make a difference & change the world. Today, we are steps away from embarking on an incredible journey of…
We champion the central role of architects in creating and sustaining a better built environment.
In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…
Seattle Good Business Network connects and inspires people to buy, produce, and invest locally, so that everyone has a meaningful stake in the local economy.
Fundraising activities to support Seattle University
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Support Public Interest Journalism in Washington State
Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility engages the community to create a healthy, just, peaceful and sustainable world. We take on the gravest current threats to human health and survival -- nuclear weapons, economic inequity, and…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forterra Nw and the most unlike its peers is Black Owned Business Excellence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Impact ↗
- Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM ↗
- Who funds FEED WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds STELLA SCHOLA PTO ↗
- Who funds THE SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds UNITED SUICIDE SURVIVORS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sports in Schools ↗
- Who funds Black Owned Business Excellence ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
- Who funds ROBERT CHINN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chinatown International District Business Improvement Area ↗
- Who funds INTREPID EVENTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPEAKERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ASIAN WEEKLY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Shoshone Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Womens Funding Alliance ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds THE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chensteino'Malleysven Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.