Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$419k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$376kEducation$337kHuman Services$268kReligion$168kHousing & Shelter$118kFood & Nutrition$93kCrime & Legal$80kYouth Development$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC$80,000
ST ELIZABETH HEALTHCARE$20,000
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$20,000
HOSEA HOUSE$20,000
FAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY$15,000
THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
SAMARITAN CAR CLINIC$10,000
BOONE COUNTY CASA$10,000
COVINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UP SPRING$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
ACUE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FIRST STEP HOME: $5k → 16%NEW DAY RANCH: $5k → 7%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 11%THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $15k → 11%THE POINT ARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $15k → 11%SAMARITAN CAR CLINIC: $10k → 11%SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $10k → 11%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 11%BE CONCERNED: $1k → 11%WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 43 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
45

Total granted

$1.6M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+21%

Still filing today

44%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +30%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +31%
  • MI
    MILESTONES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • ST
    ST TIMOTHY CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • ES
    EMERGENCY SHELTER OF NKY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Independent Living Options Inc

Empowering people with disabilities to live independent lives in the community.

—
2
Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

—
3
Day Spring Inc

Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…

Human Services
4
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
5
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
6
Simon House Inc

The organization's mission is to reduce the extent and consequences of homelessness in franklin and surrounding counties. this is accomplished by providing two low-barrier shelters that accommodate homeless men, women, and children.…

—
7
Christian Care Communities Inc

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual. christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living, 24-hour skilled nursing…

—
8
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
9
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
10
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
11
Middle Kentucky Community Action Partnership Inc

To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.

—
12
Central Louisville Community Ministries Inc

Central louisville community ministries provides emergency assistance for rent, utilities and medication. also provide in-kind assistances for food, clothing, personal care items,school supplies and haircut vouchers.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Covington Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tri-State Bleeding Disorder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLIC: $130,000 · OtherNEWPORT CENTRAL CATHOLICDIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $96,000 · OtherDIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $75,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSREDWOOD REHABILITATION CENTER: $66,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherCOVINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherEMERGENCY COLD SHELTER: $51,000 · OtherVILLA MADONNA ACADEMY: $50,000 · Other+66 more: $673,869 · Other+66 moreFAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY INC: $82,500 · HealthFAITH COMMUNIT…MILESTONES INC: $72,000 · HealthMILESTONES INCSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $65,000 · HealthSt Elizabeth M…TRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthTRI-STATE BLEE…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC: $11,000 · HealthTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 · EducationTHOMAS MO…ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationALICE LLO…Campbellsville University Inc: $22,500 · EducationCampbells…+2 more: $3,500 · EducationTHE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $30,000 · Human ServicesLife Learning Center Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE FIRST STEP HOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNEW DAY RANCH: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesUPSPRING: $53,500 · Youth DevelopmentINTERCHURCH ORGANIZATION INC: $36,000 · ReligionMENTORING PLUS INC: $16,000 · ReligionNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC: $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,251,869Health$250,500Education$153,500Human Services$92,000Youth Development$53,500Religion$52,000Crime & Legal$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $96,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY INC: $82,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMILESTONES INC: $72,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPSPRING: $53,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetINTERCHURCH ORGANIZATION INC: $36,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE VISUAL & PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $30,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLife Learning Center Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $27,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCOVINGTON LADIES HOME INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMENTORING PLUS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF COVINGTON INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMASTER PROVISIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREVIV FAMILY SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNEW PERCEPTIONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FIRST STEP HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DAY RANCH: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL KY KIDS ON THE BLOCK INC: $2,712 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBE CONCERNED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVINGTON PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBrighton Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIon Center for Violence Prevention Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNING GROVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN CATHOLIC CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILESTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPSPRING ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY CHILDRENS LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERCHURCH ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE VISUAL & PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds Life Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVINGTON LADIES HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING PLUS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500KY51.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Butler Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Duke Energy Foundation · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chas and Ruth Seligman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph