Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charlie Burchard Memorial Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Arts & Culture$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kFood & Nutrition$3kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$2kInternational$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$9,220
Median grant
1
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lake Champlain Maritime Museum$9,220
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19k · 3 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +167% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$19k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+167%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKE CHAMPLAIN MARITIME MUSEUM AT BASIN HARBOR INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +69%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +167%
  • JR
    Jim Reilly Trust
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • BM
    BRIAN MILLER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -92%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
2
Vermont Fresh Network Corporation

Advancing relationships among farmers, chefs, and consumers to grow markets and eat more locally grown food.

Community Improvement
3
Northeast Kingdom Development Corporation

Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…

Employment
4
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
5
Vermont Farmers Market Education Center

To support the local food system through access, infrastructure and education

Education
6
Milk With Dignity Standards Council Inc

Monitors compliance with, and enforces , the milk with dignity code of conduct with dairy farms that participate in the program which enlists dairy farms and milk producers to prevent and remedy human rights violations in dairy supply…

Community Improvement
7
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
8
Chittenden Dammers Inc

Advancing snowmobiling in Vermont.

Environment
9
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
10
Burlington Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer Fire/EMS Protection

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Alliance for Vermont Communities Inc

The mission of alliance for vermont communities, inc. is to protect working farms, forests and communities of central vermont and to promote responsible development that will sustain the rural heritage and values for present and future…

12
Watersheds United Vermont Inc

Wuvs mission is to empower community-based watershed groups in all parts of the state to protect and restore vermonts waters.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intervale Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Brian Miller Music Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKE CHAMPLAIN MARITIME MUSEUM AT BASIN HARBOR INC — $11,220 · Arts & CultureLAKE CHAMPLAIN MARITIME MUSEUM AT BASIN …BRIAN MILLER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureBRIAN MILLER MUSIC FOUNDATION INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…Jim Reilly Trust — $2,000 · OtherJim Reilly TrustMAKE A WISH — $1,200 · OtherMAKE A WISHIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recip…Jack Langerman Fund — $1,000 · OtherJack Langerman FundBURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL — $300 · OtherDismas of Vermont Inc — $1,000 · OtherDismas of Vermont IncINTERVALE CENTER INC — $1,000 · OtherINTERVALE CENTER INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,000 · Human ServicesBurlington Amateur Hockey Association Inc — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF MIDDLEBURY HOCKEY INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsThe North End Food Pantry Inc — $1,000 · Food & NutritionCommon Roots Inc — $1,000 · Food & NutritionLAKE CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$13,720International$7,500Other$7,500Human Services$3,000Recreation & Sports$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,000Environment$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAKE CHAMPLAIN MARITIME MUSEUM AT BASIN HARBOR INC — $11,220 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommon Roots Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERVALE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MIDDLEBURY HOCKEY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ADVENTURE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Robert Fleming & Jane Howe Patrick Foundation Inc · Lintilhac Foundation Inc · The Waterwheel Foundation · The Windham Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charlie Burchard Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc42% of income from government
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc39% of income from government
  • Intervale Center Inc13% of income from government
  • Lake Champlain Maritime Museum at Basin Harbor Inc2% of income from government
  • Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc1% of income from government
  • Common Roots Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charlie Burchard Memorial Trust?

Find your warmest path to Charlie Burchard Memorial Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph