Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Charleston County Bar Association

A nonprofit organization committed to promoting ethics and education within charleston county's legal community.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Crime & Legal$217kCivil Rights$8k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$238k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES$54,150
CHARLESTON LEGAL ACCESS$4,500
TURN 90$4,500
ONE 80 PLACE$4,500
CENTER FOR HEIRS PROPERTY$4,500
MEDIATION CENTER$4,500
CHARLESTON COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT$4,500
STEP ONE RECOVERY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES: $57k → 12%PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES: $54k → 12%PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES: $51k → 12%THE CHARLESTON FORUM: $8k → 12%CHARLESTON COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT: $5k → 12%CENTER FOR HEIRS PROPERTY: $5k → 12%CENTER FOR HEIRS PROPERTY: $5k → 12%CENTER FOR HEIRS PROPERTY: $5k → 12%TURN 90: $5k → 12%STEP ONE RECOVERY: $1k → 12%CHARLESTON LEGAL ACCESS: $5k → 12%CHARLESTON LEGAL ACCESS: $5k → 12%CHARLESTON LEGAL ACCESS: $2k → 12%TURNING LEAF PROJECT: $2k → 12%ONE 80 PLACE: $5k → 12%ONE 80 PLACE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$211k · 6 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +210% since the first grant, against -81% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$211k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+210%
-81%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24
Crime & LegalHousing & ShelterReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $162k · revenue +90%
  • CF
    Center for Heirs' Property Preservation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +234%
  • CL
    Charleston Legal Access
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHARLESTON FORUM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Louisiana Pro Bono Project
2
Fresh Start Sc

Legal resources for low income individuals and families

Community Improvement
3
Time Served

To provide free legal services and advocacy for system-impacted people in south carolina.

Human Services
4
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
5
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
6
South Carolina Legal Services

South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

Crime & Legal
7
Cumberland Trace Legal Services Inc

The mission of Kentucky Legal Aid is to assist and enable low-income families, elderly, disabled, and other vulnerable individuals in south central Kentucky resolve legal problems that are barriers to self-sufficiency and to provide these…

Crime & Legal
8
African Law Center Inc

African Law Center's mission is to defend the rights of African refugees and immigrants within countries where they seek refuge and opportunities. We achieve our mission by providing culturally appropriate and linguistically accessible…

Human Services
9
South Carolina Public Interest Foundation
Crime & Legal
10
Carolina Immigration Law

Provides immigration legal services to persons who are otherwise financially incapable of obtaining such services.

Crime & Legal
11
Lowcountry Veterans Home

Lowcountry Veterans Home provides transitional housing and individualized support for homeless veterans, working to restore stability, dignity, and independence. Through case management, peer support, transportation, and strong community…

Health
12
Center for Conflict Resolution

To empower communities, organizations and individuals to handle disputes constructively by developing and designing appropriate and creative solutions that address all interests, needs, and values.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charleston Legal Access and the most unlike its peers is Step 1 Recovery Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC — $162,375 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INCCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $14,500 · Crime & LegalCenter for Heirs' Property PreservationCharleston Legal Access — $11,500 · Crime & LegalCharleston Legal AccessTURN90 — $6,500 · Crime & LegalTHE CHARLESTON FORUM — $7,500 · OtherCHARLESTON COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT FOUNDATION — $4,500 · OtherOne-Eighty Place — $9,500 · Housing & ShelterLOWCOUNTRY MEDIATION CENTER — $7,000 · ReligionSTEP 1 RECOVERY RESOURCES INC — $1,000 · Health
Crime & Legal$194,875Other$12,000Housing & Shelter$9,500Religion$7,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC — $162,375 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $14,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCharleston Legal Access — $11,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOne-Eighty Place — $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLESTON FORUM — $7,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY MEDIATION CENTER — $7,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetTURN90 — $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The South Carolina Bar Foundation IncSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The South Carolina Bar Foundation Inc · Post and Courier Foundation · The Sunshine Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · The Joanna Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charleston County Bar Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph