Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$80kYouth Development$27kHealth$15kPublic Benefit$6kEducation$5kHuman Services$4kInternational$250
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALON SANCTUARY CONCERTS$3,000
MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER$3,000
CREATIVE YOUTH PRODUCTIONS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
GUITARS FOR VETS$2,000
THE JACOB AUGUST REIS SCHOOL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
KATE THEATER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S MUSIC FUND: $1k → 14%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY: $2k → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CT
CA
CO
AZ
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$127k · 14 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$127k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+21%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CY
    Creative Youth Productions Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +516%
  • MO
    MUSICIANS ON CALL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +161%
  • TM
    THE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MUSIC FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children Theater Project

To enhance young peoples minds through education, application and exploration of the Performing Arts. It further strives to provide each child with a feeling of self-identity and purpose.

Arts & Culture
2
The Colonial Theatre School Inc

Produce live professional theater through Shakespeare Festival and educational programs for both children and adults.

Arts & Culture
3
Blue Curtain a Nj NonProfit Corporation

Entertainment

Arts & Culture
4
The Center for International Theatre Development
Arts & Culture
5
Columbia Childrens Theatre

Inspired by the intelligence and emotional wisdom of young people, we create professional theatre for youth and families, foster inclusive community, and nurture meaningful learning through the arts. We provide these experiences through…

Arts & Culture
6
Bridges Through Music
Education
7
Orange County Childrens Theatre

OCCT provides a positive learning experience for children age 5-19 and their families in the many aspects of the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
8
Southeastern Connecticut Community Orchestra Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Rock Theatre

Instilling a desire in young people to learn to participate in live performances of song and dance.

—
10
Bridgetown Conservatory of Musical Theatre

We provide professional triple-threat training (acting, dance, and vocal performance), taught by industry professionals who have been where our students dream of going. In a challenging and supportive environment, we create the opportunity…

Arts & Culture
11
Stage Dreams Theater Inc

Youth theater for youth education

Arts & Culture
12
Artists and Musicians in Recovery
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Musicians On Call Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creative Youth Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Fire Department Theatre Company Inc: $24,000 · OtherThe Fire Department Theatre Company IncWESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $16,000 · OtherWESTCHESTER CONSERVATORY OF MUSICIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALON SANCTUARY CONCERTS: $3,000 · Other+5 more: $4,720 · Other+5 moreCreative Youth Productions Inc: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentCreative Youth Product…MUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $13,300 · Arts & CultureMUSICIANS ON CALL I…THE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSIC CONSERVAT…EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROUGH M…The Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+3 moreGuitars For Vets Inc: $4,000 · Public BenefitVETERAN TICKETS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public BenefitCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS MUSIC FUND: $1,200 · Human ServicesDONORSCHOOSEORG: $373 · EducationSISTER CITIES ESSEX HAITI INC: $250 · International
Other$74,220Youth Development$27,000Arts & Culture$23,300Public Benefit$6,000Human Services$5,200Education$373International$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreative Youth Productions Inc: $27,000 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetThe Fire Department Theatre Company Inc: $24,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $13,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGuitars For Vets Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETERAN TICKETS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS MUSIC FUND: $1,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHITNEY PLAYERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChild's Play Touring Theatre: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LEGACY THEATRE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $373 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER CITIES ESSEX HAITI INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Creative Youth Productions Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Fire Department Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSICIANS ON CALL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Guitars For Vets Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERAN TICKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS MUSIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WHITNEY PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Child's Play Touring Theatre ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds SISTER CITIES ESSEX HAITI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 55%
  • Creative Youth Productions Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc: 55% of income from government
  • The Legacy Theatre Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music Inc?

Find your warmest path to Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles Schwartz Foundation for Music’s filings →

More from the funding graph