Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2025
15
Organizations funded FY2024
7%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2025, the last year Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $128k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’19
12
’20
10
’21
12
’22
13
’23
13
’24
13
’25
11
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 15
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 7% of the organizations Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 5% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$128k12%
FY202415$108k7%
FY202315$126k7%
FY202214$115k14%
FY202113$107k0%
FY202015$127k20%
FY201912$86kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$159kYouth Development$85kHuman Services$85kRecreation & Sports$80kReligion$80kArts & Culture$70kCivil Rights$70kEducation$56kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Second Harvest Heartland$138,62580%
Byron Dorgan Youth Wellness Center$95,00085%
Division of Indian Work$85,00080%
Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation$80,00080%
Native American Rights Fund Inc$80,00080%
St Anns Church$50,0005n/a
St Josephs Indian School$40,0008n/a
Twin Cities Rise$35,00070%
MIGIZI Communications Inc$35,00070%
Dream of Wild Health$30,67070%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Second Harvest Heartland$138,62580%
Byron Dorgan Youth Wellness Center$95,00085%
Division of Indian Work$85,00080%
Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation$80,00080%
Native American Rights Fund Inc$80,00080%
St Anns Church$50,0005n/a
St Josephs Indian School$40,0008n/a
Twin Cities Rise$35,00070%
MIGIZI Communications Inc$35,00070%
Dream of Wild Health$30,67070%
Lower Phalen Creek Project$30,50071%
Tm Mikinaak Ode Center$30,00052%
Native American Veterans Assistance$15,00030%
Lake Street Council$10,00010%
Turtle Mountain Community College$9,00020%
All Indigenous Recruiting Organization$2,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($146k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSecond Harvest Heartland: $138,625 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetByron Dorgan Youth Wellness Center: $95,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetDivision of Indian Work: $85,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCrazy Horse Memorial Foundation: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Rights Fund Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTwin Cities Rise: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDream of Wild Health: $30,670 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLower Phalen Creek Project: $30,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTm Mikinaak Ode Center: $30,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNative American Veterans Assistance: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLake Street Council: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTurtle Mountain Community College: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Minnesota Humanities Center · Mortenson Family Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Northwest Area Foundation · Manitou Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Common Counsel Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation with peer funders

About Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation

How much does Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation give?
Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation reported 17 grants totaling $128,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 15 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2026, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (20%), Youth Development (11%), Human Services (11%).
Who are Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2026: Second Harvest Heartland ($139k), Byron Dorgan Youth Wellness Center ($95k), Division of Indian Work ($85k).
Does Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Otto Bremer Trust, Margaret a Cargill Foundation, Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation.
Where is Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation based?
Charles P & Mary E Belgarde Foundation is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles P & Mary E Belgarde’s filings →

More from the funding graph