· Private foundation
Charles & Marcia Larsenanthony & Priscilla Beadell Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k55 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM | $33,000 |
| PENINSUAL MUSIC FESTIVAL | $10,000 |
| LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| DOOR COMMUNITY AUDITORIUM | $5,000 |
| MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $3,000 |
| BIRCH CREEK MUSIC PERFORM | $2,500 |
| PENINSULA PLAYERS | $2,500 |
| EPHRAIM MORAVIAN CHURCH | $2,000 |
| DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
| HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC | $1,125 |
| MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER | $1,000 |
| NORTHERN DOOR CHILD CARE | $1,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $206k · revenue +20%
PENINSULA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +38%- DCDOOR COMMUNITY AUDITORIUM CORP8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- LCLAWRENCE CENTER ACADEMIC SUCCESSone grant, 2020 · $25k
- UMUNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $5k
- GSGOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…
The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…
Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.
Inspiring individuals and communities through exceptional music education, accessible to all.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…
To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.
The minnesota orchestra mission is to enrich, inspire and serve our community as an enduring symphony orchestra internationally recognized for its artistic excellence.
The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…
Making the arts accessible to all
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds DOOR COMMUNITY AUDITORIUM CORP ↗
- Who funds DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN SKY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds DOOR SHAKESPEARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT KINDRED INC ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA SCHOOL OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds MIDSUMMER'S MUSIC LTD ↗
- Who funds EPHRAIM MENS CLUB ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Ellsworth and Carla Peterson Charitable Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Door County Community Foundation Inc · Mmg Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Tatman Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles & Marcia Larsenanthony & Priscilla Beadell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles & Marcia Larsenanthony & Priscilla Beadell Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Charles & Marcia Larsenanthony & Priscilla Beadell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.