Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$601k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$677kRecreation & Sports$598kArts & Culture$303kPublic Safety & Disaster$285kHealth$150kHousing & Shelter$139kYouth Development$130kHuman Services$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $461k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEUBENVILLE CITY SCHOOLS$100,000
SALEM TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES$44,500
CITY OF TORONTO$30,000
INDIAN CREEK BAND BOOSTERS$28,000
BARTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
JEFFERSON COUNTY 911$25,000
EDISON LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BELLAIRE CITY SCHOOLS$20,000
THE MIRACLE LEAGUE$20,000
TORONTO CITY SCHOOLS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
TILTONSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $1k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WEST VIRGINIA: $1k → 15%GREATER WEIRTON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $22k → 12%OUR PLACE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 75%.

Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 35 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
61

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+11%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $257k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Public Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    Ohio Valley Youth Network
    3× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +247%
  • SC
    SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $53k · revenue +96%
  • OV
    OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $51k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • SB
    STEUBENVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • GS
    GREAT STONE VIADUCT HSTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • TS
    TRI STATE HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department of Starke County Indiana

Volunteer fire department

—
2
Grandview Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Providing public fire protection and emergency rescue services.

—
3
Ballville Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To provide fire protection and emergency rescue service for ballville township and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Ohiopyle Stewart Volunteer Fire Company

To provide fire suppression, auto accident rescue, lost person rescue for the ohiopyle borough and stewart township

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Taylor Township Volunteer Fire Department
—
6
Middleway Volunteer Fire Company

To provide volunteer fire, rescue and ambulance services to the residents of the counties of jefferson and berkeley, wv.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Williams Township Vol Fire Dept Volunteer Fire Department

The organization's purpose is to provide volunteer fire fighting services.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Lewisburg Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire protection for the City of Lewisburg, WV and surrounding areas

—
9
Summerhill Township Volunteer Fire Co

To provide fire and emergency services to community

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Vienna Volunteer Fire Department

Non profit volunteer fire department for the city of vienna, wv and surrounding areas. committed to educating communities about fire and safety.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Stewartsville Chamblissburg Vfc Inc

We are a volunteer fire company and EMS service to our community. Founded in 1959, our organizations serves over 4,000 homes.

—
12
Bakersville Volunteer Fire Company of Jefferson Township

Volunteer fire department.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Edison High School Band Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
19/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $123,550 · OtherSTEUBENVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $117,400 · OtherSALEM TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES: $113,500 · OtherSTEUBENVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION: $100,000 · Other+90 more: $1,966,106 · Other+90 moreHILLNDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPART INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWINTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBARTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTILTONSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPLEASANT HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster+2 more: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTRI STATE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $53,014 · HealthOHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER: $51,100 · HealthSTEUBENVILLE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $68,000 · Recreation & SportsTRI STATE UNITED SOCCER LTD: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $51,004 · AnimalsJEFFERSON COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $27,500 · AnimalsINDIAN CREEK BAND BOOSTERS INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureHANCOCK COUNTY MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSteubenville Historic Landmarks Foundation: $25,000 · Arts & CultureOhio Valley Youth Network: $65,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,420,556Public Safety & Disaster$127,000Health$104,114Recreation & Sports$88,000Animals$78,504Arts & Culture$78,000Youth Development$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEUBENVILLE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $68,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetOhio Valley Youth Network: $65,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $53,290 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTRI STATE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $53,014 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER: $51,100 over 4y, 11% of budgetHANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $51,004 over 3y, 19% of budgetOLD FORT STEUBEN PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetHarrison County Tourism Council Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHILLNDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPART INC: $30,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWINTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetINDIAN CREEK BAND BOOSTERS INC: $28,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetHANCOCK COUNTY MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetBARTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSteubenville Historic Landmarks Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetGREATER WEIRTON SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $21,679 over 1y, 25% of budgetTILTONSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTRI STATE UNITED SOCCER LTD: $20,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetPLEASANT HILL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWEIRTON CHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $17,320 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR PLACE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEBA OUTREACH FOOD PANTRY: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAIM WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $4,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Bread Basket Inc: $1,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEUBENVILLE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Valley Youth Network ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CATHOLIC CENTRAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRI STATE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD FORT STEUBEN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Harrison County Tourism Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLNDALE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPART INC ↗
  • Who funds WINTERSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds EDISON HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024PA30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John C Williams Charitable Tr 8024 · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Mary Jane Brooks Charitable Trust · Esther N Simmons Charitable Trust · Hancock County Savings Charitable Foundation · Steel Valley Charities · Laposta-Banketas Family Foundation · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · American Electric Power Foundation · Margaretta Churchman Char Trust · James B Chambers Memorial

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles M Pugliese and Thelma M Pugliese’s filings →

    More from the funding graph