Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
116
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$408kPhilanthropy$203kReligion$131kEmployment$81kArts & Culture$76kAnimals$21kHealth$19kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 116 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k112 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$100
Median grant
22
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY AND CAREER SERVICES$50,100
CONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN$13,948
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LOUISVILLE$11,345
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$10,220
PAWS WITH PURPOSE$5,692
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$4,659
CROHNS AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$2,852
CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM$2,730
MDX SPORTS INC$2,100
IMPACT 100 LOUISVILLE$2,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$2,000
MILLS ACADEMY$2,000
CITIZEN OF LOUISVILLE ORGANIZED AND UNITED TOGETHER$1,994
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR SUCCESSFUL AGING: $180 → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%THE FIRST CAR PROJECT: $500 → 4%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $50 → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $35 → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $35 → 7%UNITY PARTNERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $4k → 15%UNITY PARTNERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $45 → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $50 → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $50 → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $50 → 15%UNITING PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $1k → 15%UNITING PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $100 → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $6k → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $6k → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $5k → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $1k → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $972 → 15%NEW ROOTS: $8k → 15%HOSPARUS HEALTH: $50 → 15%HOSPARUS HEALTH: $18 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 127 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

127 repeat relationships: 75 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

127
92

Total granted

$382k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IL
    IMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • CA
    CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +54%
  • SA
    SPEED ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -42%
  • NR
    NEW ROOTS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -96%
  • FF
    FUNDS FOR RANSOM EVERGLADES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
5
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
6
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
11
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Mdx Sports Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 262 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
148/149
Grantees still filing
94/149
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $484,879 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INCGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $95,460 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC+6 more: $26,535 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY AND CAREER SERVICES: $80,912 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CAREER SERVICESTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $64,017 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN: $56,983 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUNIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLOOM JEWISH MUSIC FOUNDATION: $11,750 · Other+135 more: $98,369 · Other+135 moreTHE PEACE STUDIO: $13,600 · Arts & CultureCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS: $7,830 · Arts & CultureSPEED ART MUSEUM: $6,564 · Arts & CultureFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $2,300 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $3,945 · Arts & CulturePAWS WITH PURPOSE INC: $19,174 · Human ServicesNEW ROOTS INC: $8,036 · Human ServicesUniting Partners for Women and Children: $5,145 · Human Services+6 more: $1,450 · Human ServicesTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,120 · Recreation & SportsMDX Sports Inc: $2,100 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC: $475 · Recreation & SportsCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,952 · HealthICU Baby Inc: $3,150 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $867 · HealthTIP IT FORWARD: $600 · Health+9 more: $1,652 · HealthColumbia College Chicago: $2,500 · EducationKozyak Minority Mentoring Foundation Inc: $2,000 · EducationLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,944 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $300 · Education+8 more: $1,172 · Education
Philanthropy$606,874Other$332,031Arts & Culture$34,239Human Services$33,805Recreation & Sports$12,695Health$10,221Education$7,916

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $484,879 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $95,460 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS WITH PURPOSE INC: $19,174 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PEACE STUDIO: $13,600 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $12,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,120 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ROOTS INC: $8,036 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS: $7,830 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPEED ART MUSEUM: $6,564 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniting Partners for Women and Children: $5,145 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCitizens of Louisville Organized and United Together Inc: $4,294 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,952 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICU Baby Inc: $3,150 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetColumbia College Chicago: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKozyak Minority Mentoring Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMCCJ INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC: $1,944 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPTA COLORADO CONGRESS: $1,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,560 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,208 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC: $1,111 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $1,104 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC: $940 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $867 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Forward Fund Inc: $860 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $820 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLouisville Visual Art Inc: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MEMPHIS: $778 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $758 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN LOUISVILLE SECTION: $702 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPETER LONDON GLOBAL DANCE COMPANY I NC: $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLES DAMES D'ESCOFFIER INTERNATIONAL INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIP IT FORWARD: $600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOld Friends Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $525 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST CAR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS KENTUCKY INC: $475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $433 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $402 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS WITH PURPOSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACE STUDIO ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds THE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100 LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds SPEED ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Uniting Partners for Women and Children ↗
  • Who funds Citizens of Louisville Organized and United Together Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ICU Baby Inc ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College Chicago ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MDX Sports Inc ↗
  • Who funds Kozyak Minority Mentoring Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MCCJ INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PTA COLORADO CONGRESS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY52.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Orleans Conservation Trust: 2% of income from government
  • The National Federation of the Blind: 2% of income from government
  • Icu Baby Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Sanctuary of the Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 262 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles L Weisberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph