Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles H Cross Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$44kYouth Development$30kRecreation & Sports$29kEducation$20kInternational$8k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$530k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sibling Connections Inc$4,500
World is Our Classroon$4,500
Alianza DV Services Inc$4,500
Dream Big$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Sibling Connections Inc: $6k → 16%Sibling Connections Inc: $6k → 16%Sibling Connections Inc: $5k → 16%Sibling Connections Inc: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$103k · 6 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$103k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    Dream Big Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +102%
  • SC
    SIBLING CONNECTIONS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +77%
  • LC
    LITERATIONS CORP
    2× · 2020–2021 · $16k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • PH
    Project Hope
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • A
    Alianza
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • YB
    YOUTHBUILD BOSTON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls in Stem
Human Services
2
Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart and bold by providing essential resources and programs to at risk, low-income girls and their families. girls inc. helps build girls' capacity for responsible and confident adulthood,…

Youth Development
3
Kids in Tech Inc

Kids in tech, inc. is a statewide organization that excites, educates, and empowers children across massachusetts to use technology, promoting a positive environment and fostering lifelong interest in stem. through our after-school…

Education
4
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education
5
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
6
Girls Inc

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold through direct service and advocacy. our programming is delivered to girls in partnership with schools and at our centers across 75 affiliates.

Youth Development
7
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
8
Girls Incorporated of Greater Santa Barbara

The organizations mission is to inspire all girls to be strong,smart, and bold, through research-based, innovative, and educational programs and activities.

—
9
Girls Incorporated of Long Island

The mission of girls incorporated of long island, is to inspire girls to be strong, smart, and bold. the organization provides school and community based programming that serves the unique needs of girls, ages 5-18, living in the nassau…

Education
10
Electric Girls Inc

Electric girls builds girls' (ages 5 to 14) confidence & capabilities by engaging them in science, technology, engineering, and math (stem). electric girls facilitates in-school and extra-curricular programs (after-school, weekends, summer…

—
11
Girls Inc of Greater Pittsburgh

Girls inc of greater pittsburgh empowers girls to imagine a broader future through a curriculum grounded on female role models delivered by college women mentors, who are themselves mentored by professional women.

Human Services
12
Girls With Impact Inc

Girls with impact, inc. is the nation's only live, online business & leadership program for young women ages 14-24 years old. its mission is to level the playing field for all women in business and beyond by equipping them with the skills,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Club for Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Is Our Classroom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIBLING CONNECTIONS INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesSIBLING CONNECTIONS INCALIANZA DV SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesALIANZA DV SERVICES INCGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER: $8,500 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCE…Project Hope: $8,000 · OtherProject HopeAlianza: $7,500 · OtherAlianzaYOUTHBUILD BOSTON INC: $7,500 · OtherYOUTHBUILD BOSTON INCLITERATIONS CORP: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentLITERATIONS CORPSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS IN…Dream Big Inc: $28,500 · Recreation & SportsDream Big IncWORLD IS OUR CLASSROOM INC: $4,500 · Education
Human Services$36,000Other$31,500Youth Development$29,500Recreation & Sports$28,500Education$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDream Big Inc: $28,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSIBLING CONNECTIONS INC: $21,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetLITERATIONS CORP: $15,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALIANZA DV SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTHBUILD BOSTON INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD IS OUR CLASSROOM INC: $4,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles H Cross Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles H Cross Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Alianza Dv Services Inc: 82% of income from government
  • Sibling Connections Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Boston Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Worcester: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles H Cross Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles H Cross Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles H Cross’ filings →

More from the funding graph