Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.9MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.6MReligion$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MAnimals$803kHealth$678kRecreation & Sports$637kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $388k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $996k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$250,000
THE VILLAGE NAC$200,000
Individual grant recipient$144,795
Individual grant recipient$110,000
NACOGDOCHES BOYS YOUTH BASEBALL$109,365
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DEEP EAST TX$100,000
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$80,431
NACOGDOCHES COUNTY HOSPITAL$51,077
LOVE INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
FRIENDS OF HISTORIC NACOGDOCHES$50,000
GLORY GANG MINISTRIES$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,551
NACOGDOCHES HERO FOUNDATION$34,677
STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY$30,608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $5k → 9%GOD'S OPEN DOOR TO ETERNAL LIFE INC: $14k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 70 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
52

Total granted

$13M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

23%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    The Village Nac Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $800k · revenue +146% · 43% of their budget
  • TH
    THE HELPING HOUSE
    3× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +47%
  • GG
    GLORY GANG MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +14% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • NF
    NACOGDOCHES FEDERATION OF WOMENS
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • KN
    Keep Nacogdoches Beautiful
    one grant, 2021 · $140k · revenue -88% · 34% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Texas Alternative Home School

Helping people to get high school diplomas

Education
3
Faith Bible Church Atx

The church exists to glorify God and make disciples of Jesus Christ

Religion
4
University of North Texas Health Science Center At Ft Worth Health Systems

To improve the health and quality of life for the people of texas and beyond through excellence in education, research, clinical care, community engagement and to provide national leadership in primary care.

Health
5
Reaching Outdoors of Texas

Working togther to produce good fruit by reaching outdoors into god's creation.

Youth Development
6
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
7
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
8
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
9
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
10
Convencion Bautista Hispana De Texas

The convencion bautista hispana de texas - the hispanic baptist convention of texas - convencion exists to serve its congregations and members to fulfill their god-inspired mission and vision. the vision of convencion is to become a family…

Religion
11
Houston Graduate School of Theology

Equip women and men to be ministers and messengers of God's mission of reconciliation through academic excellence, personal transformation, and leadership development.

—
12
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

The university of mary hardin-baylor prepares students for leadership, service, and faith-informed discrenment in a global society. academic excellence, personal attention, broad-based scholarship and a commitment to a baptist vision for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Regents Academy of Nacogdoches Inc; the most unlike its peers is Garrison Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
13/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,135,540 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF HISTORIC NACOGDOCHES INC: $920,842 · OtherFRIENDS OF HISTORIC NACOGDOCHES INCNACOGDOCHES SENIOR CENTER: $911,510 · OtherNACOGDOCHES SENIOR CENTERLOVE INC: $803,358 · OtherLOVE INCSTEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY: $581,914 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $498,589 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DEEP EAST TX: $430,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $391,000 · Other+104 more: $4,636,240 · Other+104 moreThe Village Nac Inc: $799,595 · ReligionGLORY GANG MINISTRIES INC: $150,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionHUMANE SOCIETY OF NACOGDOCHES COUNT: $572,000 · AnimalsNac Foster Rescue: $60,500 · AnimalsSOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION: $215,887 · EducationTHE HELPING HOUSE: $158,000 · EducationLeTourneau University: $67,752 · Education+5 more: $29,973 · EducationCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $90,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesNACOGDOCHES HERO FOUNDATION: $34,677 · Human ServicesBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Human ServicesGOD'S OPEN DOOR TO ETERNAL LIFE INC: $13,789 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP: $220,500 · EmploymentNACOGDOCHES BOYS YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $159,365 · Recreation & Sports
Other$11,308,993Religion$950,095Animals$632,500Education$471,612Human Services$258,466Employment$220,500Recreation & Sports$159,365

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Village Nac Inc: $799,595 over 5y, 43% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NACOGDOCHES COUNT: $572,000 over 9y, 40% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP: $220,500 over 8y, 27% of budgetSOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION: $215,887 over 5y, 57% of budgetNACOGDOCHES BOYS YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $159,365 over 2y, 67% of budgetGLORY GANG MINISTRIES INC: $150,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetKeep Nacogdoches Beautiful: $140,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLeTourneau University: $67,752 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNac Foster Rescue: $60,500 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetWOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLORIA RUSSELL CHILDREN'S MINISTRY: $14,800 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,310 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetTEXAS ARCHEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDOUGLASS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetJacksonville College: $4,973 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION UPREACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Village Nac Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NACOGDOCHES COUNT ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP ↗
  • Who funds SOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NACOGDOCHES BOYS YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HELPING HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GLORY GANG MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Keep Nacogdoches Beautiful ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds LeTourneau University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · The Callaway Foundation · Nacogdoches County United Way · Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust · The Elliott Family Foundation · Hood Family Foundation · San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · The Pineywoods Foundation · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles & Lois Marie Bright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph