· Community foundation
Nacogdoches County United Way
Allocations of donations to non-profit organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $182,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $229,527 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,327 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NACOGDOCHES TREATMENT CENTER | $23,000 |
| NACOGDOCHES HOPE FOOD PANTRY | $18,000 |
| NACOGDOCHES COUNTY AGING COMM | $18,000 |
| CASA OF DEEP EAST TEXAS | $17,500 |
| COMMUNITY RX HELP | $17,000 |
| SOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION | $16,000 |
| THE HELPING HOUSE | $12,000 |
| FAMILY CRISIS CENTER | $12,000 |
| ANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN | $11,200 |
| LOVE INC | $10,500 |
| ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF DEEP EAST | $10,000 |
| GOD'S OPEN DOOR TO ETERNAL LIFE | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCOMMUNITY RX HELP8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +13% · 71% of their budget
- COCASA OF DEEP EAST TEXAS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +33%
- SFSOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +130% · 29% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $8k
- GGGLORY GANG MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.
To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).
Interview facility for child abuse victims.
To work to ensure children receive the needed services to overcome abuse and neglect.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To provide shelter to abused families.
Counseling services to individuals for substance abuse, domestic violence, general classes, anger management, day sessions, parenting classes, ged and other educational classes. supply clothing and food to needy.
The organization will provide assistance to families and individuals in need in the fredericksburg, texas community. the organization will also be a point of contact to refer families to other non-profit organizations within the community…
Child Advocacy Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Crisis Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Helping House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY RX HELP ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DEEP EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds SOLID FOUNDATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE HELPING HOUSE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANGELINA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NACOGDOCHES HOPE ↗
- Who funds GOD'S OPEN DOOR TO ETERNAL LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds NACOGDOCHES COUNTY AGING COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds GLORY GANG MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nacogdoches County United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.