Skip to content

· Charitable trust

Charles a Hamilton Charitable Trust

To provide financial support to selected 501(c)(3) organiztions in order to accomplish specific charitable goals within the community of calhoun county, alabama and its surronding areas.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.1MHuman Services$586kReligion$205kEducation$55kPhilanthropy$23k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $203,830, the rows itemized in this filing. The $214,730 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $109k
$32,700
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF ANNISTON$54,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CALHOUN COUNTY$54,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA$32,700
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$32,700
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$21,800
BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC$7,630
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $17k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $9k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $8k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $7k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $7k → 12%BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$2.0M
$0

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $514k · revenue +52%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +246%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +62%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Boy Scouts of America 96 Central Ga Council

    The boy scouts provide a program for community organizations that offers effective character, citizenship and personal fitness training for youth. the organization endeavors to develop american citizens who are physically, mentally and…

    —
    2
    The Young Men's Christian Association of Birmingham Inc

    The young men's christian association of birmingham, inc. is a charitable organization that opens its doors to all women, men, families, teenagers, and children regardless of their ability to pay. the mission of the ymca is to put…

    Human Services
    3
    Boy Scouts of America Natl Council 101 Northeast Georgia Council

    The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by scouting of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of scouting of america, the…

    Youth Development
    4
    Boys & Girls Clubs of East Alabama

    To inspire all young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

    —
    5
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

    Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

    Youth Development
    6
    Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc

    To provide club members with a safe, supportive, fun, and enriching environment that inspires and empowers them to achieve their greatest potential. bgcmd accomplishes this mission with a foundational social- emotional learning approach…

    —
    7
    East Carolina Council Bsa

    The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

    —
    8
    Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

    To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

    Human Services
    9
    Girl Scouts of North East Ohio

    Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

    Youth Development
    10
    Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

    To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    11
    Boys and Girls Clubs of the Twin Cities

    To enable young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. for more information visit www.boysandgirls.org.

    Youth Development
    12
    The Family Y Young Men's Christian Association/Ywco of the Csra Inc

    Our mission is to serve individuals and families in the csra through programs designed to build healthy spirit, mind, and body, reflecting the values of the judeo-christian tradition while maintaining respect for all people.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of America; the most unlike its peers is Birmingham-Southern College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    3/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $513,695 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INCGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $308,218 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA+1 more: $16,875 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $513,695 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIO…YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $71,917 · Human ServicesYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INCGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $308,218 · OtherGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY…FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $205,478 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $55,104 · OtherBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGEUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $22,502 · Philanthropy
    Youth Development$838,788Human Services$585,612Other$568,800Philanthropy$22,502

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $513,695 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $513,695 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $308,218 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $308,218 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $71,917 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $55,104 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $22,502 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $16,875 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
    • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗
    • Who funds YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC ↗
    • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Alabama Power Foundation IncAL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Charles a Hamilton Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles a Hamilton Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Charles a Hamilton’s filings →

      More from the funding graph