Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$404kEducation$129kPhilanthropy$34kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kInternational$5kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $73k
$4,700
Median grant
8
States reached
$732k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CHARLES$21,600
ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE$11,000
SALESIANUM TRUST$10,000
PRO-LIFE WISCONSIN ETF$10,000
ST FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY$6,500
ST PAUL CATHOLIC CENTER$6,000
EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC$5,500
PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF HOLY CROSS FOUNDATION$5,000
PETAWA CULTURAL CENTER$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM$5,000
WOODLAWN FOUNDATION$5,000
FOCUS$4,700
ARISE MILWAUKEE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $250 → 9%LIFE CONNECTIONS: $3k → 5%LIFE CONNECTIONS: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
CT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$620k · 37 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
26

Total granted

$620k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +83%
  • OR
    Oconomowoc Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +286%
  • WF
    WOODLAWN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • PU
    PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF HOLY CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • PU
    PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY C
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
2
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
3
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
4
Ave Maria University Inc

University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church

Education
5
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
6
Word On Fire Catholic Ministries

Word on fire catholic ministries is a global media apostolate that supports the work of bishop robert barron and reaches millons of individuals to draw them back to or into the catholic faith.

Religion
7
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
8
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
9
Our Sunday Visitor Inc

Our sunday visitor's mission is to serve the church by providing catholics with materials that will strengthen their relationship with christ, deepen their commitment to the church and help them to see the world through the eyes of faith.

Religion
10
Lumen Christi Institute

To make the catholic intellectual tradition a vital part of the culture of universities. to enrich academic communities at the university of chicago, across the nation, and the world with the insights of catholic thought. to dialogue with…

—
11
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
12
Risen Jesus Inc

Risen Jesus, Inc. provides religious education to college students and adults. This is accomplished via public lectures, debates and resources written and electronic on the ministry website www.risenjesus.com. Dr. Michael Licona is also a…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance Defending Freedom; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST CHARLES: $126,437 · OtherST CHARLESCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE: $92,000 · OtherCURSILLO IN CHRISTIANITY OF THE ARC HDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEECHESTERTON ACADEMY: $60,850 · OtherCHESTERTON ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $47,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $40,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARYPRO-LIFE WISCONSIN ETF: $20,000 · OtherFORMATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+50 more: $186,183 · Other+50 moreTHE EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC INC: $26,000 · ReligionTHE EVANGE…WOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · ReligionWOODLAWN F…IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $10,000 · ReligionIMMACULATE…Arise Milwaukee Inc: $6,000 · ReligionArise Milw…FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD: $5,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF…+2 more: $2,250 · ReligionPONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY CROSS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalANDEAN HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $250 · InternationalLIFE'S CONNECTION INC: $3,700 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $250 · Human ServicesALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2,250 · Civil RightsVIRTUE SPORTS INC: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$592,820Religion$59,250International$5,250Human Services$3,950Civil Rights$2,250Youth Development$1,250Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOconomowoc Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc: $13,555 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetWOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArise Milwaukee Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY CROSS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLIFE'S CONNECTION INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVIRTUE SPORTS INC: $1,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAYTON STUDY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDEAN HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EVANGELICAL CATHOLIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Oconomowoc Rotary Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Arise Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY CROSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BRIDEGROOM LTD ↗
  • Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRTUE SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PARADISUS DEI INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI18.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Charleston Family Foundation Inc · Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc · Mercy Works Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins?

    Find your warmest path to Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charitable Trust Agreement of Brion & Jennifer Collins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph