Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallace

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$23kFood & Nutrition$7kHousing & Shelter$5kAnimals$5kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$3kEducation$2kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$66k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN$1,750
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$1,000
ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO$500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA$455
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $250 → 16%ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE: $750 → 17%HEIFFER INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $1k → 14%BIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN: $2k → 12%ST MARTINS CHAMBER CHOIR: $100 → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 7%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $150 → 16%ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE: $500 → 17%HEIFFER INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 17%BIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE R: $1k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE ST VRAIN VALLEY: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $3k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%THE ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE: $500 → 17%HEIFFER INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 17%BIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE R: $1k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE: $500 → 17%HEIFFER INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 17%BIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE ROCKIES: $1k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE ST VRAIN VALLEY: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE: $500 → 17%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $1k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 → 7%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA: $455 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $2k → 12%ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $500 → 12%ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $500 → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $1k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $1k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $750 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallace’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallacelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 11 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$39k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+120%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +23%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +115%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • CN
    COLORADO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +120%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
3
Colorado Nature League

To protect, conserve, and restore colorado's native wildlife and habitats. we champion science-based, innovative, collaborative solutions for managing colorado's iconic wildlife and biodiversity, protecting them from threats like habitat…

Environment
4
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
5
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
6
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
9
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
10
Western Sustainability Exchange

Advancing sustainability in the western area of the united states through a series of programs and activities designed to promote better ranching practices. a strong focus is to provide ranchers with the information, tools, technical…

Environment
11
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
12
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Native Plant Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTN: $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLO FNDTNTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN: $2,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAINBIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE R: $2,000 · OtherBIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE RHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VA: $1,955 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST VRAIN VAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY: $1,500 · Other+1 more: $400 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $7,250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE…ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY: $3,000 · AnimalsENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE INC: $2,750 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $1,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsST MARTINS CHAMBER CHOIR: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$31,855Food & Nutrition$7,250Animals$3,000Philanthropy$2,750Environment$2,500Education$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,000Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $7,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE INC: $2,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARTINS CHAMBER CHOIR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds ENDANGERED LANGUAGE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ST VRAIN VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds ST MARTINS CHAMBER CHOIR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallace funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallace. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charitable Foundation of the Estate Helen J Wallace’s filings →

    More from the funding graph