Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Chang & Xiaohui Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
6
Organizations funded FY2018
67%
First-time grantees FY2018
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of Chang & Xiaohui Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Chang & Xiaohui Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $5k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
5
’18
2
’19
1
’20
1
’21
5
’22
3
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2018
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$1,300
Organizations funded a year
3 to 6
FY2017 to FY2018
States reached, FY2018
2
Total assets, FY2018
$477k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2018, 67% of the organizations Chang & Xiaohui Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 55% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20186$5k67%
FY20173$3kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$170kScience & Tech$30kArts & Culture$22kEducation$17kHealth$5kReligion$5kEmployment$3kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Life Sciences Research Foundation$30,00030%
Peking University Education Foundation (Usa)$7,30020%
Shin Shin Educational Foundation$5,10030%
Hope Services$3,31420%
Pacific East Quality Education$2,70420%
Chung Tai International Chan Buddhist Association$1,3001n/a
Svidea Org$1,2401n/a
Chinese Junior Golf Foundation$1,0001n/a
Huafu Alumni Association Northern California$1,0001n/a
Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation$1,00010%
Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Chang & Xiaohui Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Life Sciences Research Foundation$30,00030%
Peking University Education Foundation (Usa)$7,30020%
Shin Shin Educational Foundation$5,10030%
Hope Services$3,31420%
Pacific East Quality Education$2,70420%
Chung Tai International Chan Buddhist Association$1,3001n/a
Svidea Org$1,2401n/a
Chinese Junior Golf Foundation$1,0001n/a
Huafu Alumni Association Northern California$1,0001n/a
Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation$1,00010%
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation$6002n/a
Autism Speaks Inc$3601n/a
Peking University Alumni Association of Northern California$1601n/a

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($29k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Chang & Xiaohui Foundation with peer funders

About Chang & Xiaohui Foundation

How much does Chang & Xiaohui Foundation give?
Chang & Xiaohui Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $4,864 in its FY2018 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2018.
What does Chang & Xiaohui Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (67%), Science & Tech (12%), Arts & Culture (9%).
Who are Chang & Xiaohui Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Life Sciences Research Foundation ($30k), Peking University Education Foundation (Usa) ($7k), Shin Shin Educational Foundation ($5k).
Does Chang & Xiaohui Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2018, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Chang & Xiaohui Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Chang & Xiaohui Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Chang & Xiaohui Foundation based?
Chang & Xiaohui Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chang & Xiaohui’s filings →

More from the funding graph