Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$352kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$16,750
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$9,500
CENTRAL COLLEGE$4,000
LUTHER COLLEGE$4,000
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,000
SIMPSON COLLEGE$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wartburg College: $2k → 7%COE: $1k → 9%Buena Vista University: $1k → 10%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 10%WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%Marshalltown Community College: $1k → 11%University of Iowa: $1k → 15%Indian Hills Comm College: $3k → 16%Kirkwood Community College: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$345k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$345k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-4%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +43%
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • CC
    CENTRAL COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLEN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -6%
  • IH
    Indian Hills Comm College
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • WC
    WARTBURG COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
4
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

5
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
6
Eckerd College

The mission of eckerd college is to provide excellent innovative undergraduate liberal arts education and lifelong learning programs in the unique florida environment, within the context of a covenant relationship with the presbyterian…

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wartburg College and the most unlike its peers is Indian Hills Community College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA — $103,858 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWAIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY — $90,031 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IOWA — $28,066 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWADES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $20,624 · OtherDES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGEINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $9,400 · Other+8 more — $27,792 · Other+8 moreWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $33,067 · EducationWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITYLUTHER COLLEGE — $14,832 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGECENTRAL COLLEGE — $13,130 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGEBuena Vista University — $6,080 · EducationBuena Vista UniversitySimpson College — $6,000 · EducationSimpson College+1 more — $1,600 · Education
Other$279,771Education$74,709

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY — $33,067 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE — $14,832 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE — $13,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $9,400 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBuena Vista University — $6,080 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLEN COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE — $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds Buena Vista University
  • Who funds Simpson College
  • Who funds ALLEN COLLEGE
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fahrney Education Fdtn TrustWI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust · Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph