Skip to content

California · Public charity

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy

To promote and bring about advances in areas of public policy.

$29M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$26,250,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$26,250,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 41
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$33M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Crime & LegalCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$29M0%
FY20232$60M0%
FY20224$36M0%
FY202122$76M36%
FY202033$39M55%
FY201941$26M78%
FY201815$45M87%
FY20176$44Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$222MCrime & Legal$108MHousing & Shelter$16MPublic Benefit$11MHuman Services$2.9MCommunity Improvement$2.2MEducation$1.3MInternational$200kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
LA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fwdus Inc$199,910,075898%
The Just Trust for Action$83,650,00044%
NPH Action Fund$11,566,200498%
Schools and Communities First$10,788,510317%
Accountable Justice Action Fund$10,000,0001n/a
Tides Advocacy$8,150,00041%
California YIMBY$3,345,412458%
Ohio Safe and Healthy Communities Campaign$3,000,0001n/a
Californians Against the Prison Spending Scam$2,250,000129%
Action for Safety and Justice$1,500,0001n/a
Show all 77 grantees
All grantees of Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fwdus Inc$199,910,075898%
The Just Trust for Action$83,650,00044%
NPH Action Fund$11,566,200498%
Schools and Communities First$10,788,510317%
Accountable Justice Action Fund$10,000,0001n/a
Tides Advocacy$8,150,00041%
California YIMBY$3,345,412458%
Ohio Safe and Healthy Communities Campaign$3,000,0001n/a
Californians Against the Prison Spending Scam$2,250,000129%
Action for Safety and Justice$1,500,0001n/a
Drug Policy Action$1,320,372333%
Silicon Valley Rising Action$1,280,000341%
Rise Up Inc$1,150,000239%
Techequity Action$1,000,0001n/a
Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action$1,000,000352%
PICO California Action Fund$850,000188%
Social Good Advocacy Fund$820,000327%
Justleadershipusa Inc$799,99920%
Forward Justice$759,713114%
Million Voters Project Action Fund for Schools and Communities First$709,047236%
The Primary School Lab$700,0001n/a
Bay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition$665,000368%
Sv Home Action Fund$550,000275%
More Treatment for a Better Oregon Yes on 110$500,000113%
Purpose Dignity Action$466,00012%
Prison Fellowship Ministries$440,00030%
North Carolina Justice Center$415,62524%
Faith in Action Fund$375,0001n/a
American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky Inc$365,000252%
Yimby Action$365,000325%
Safety and Justice Oregon$360,000124%
Vital Strategies Inc$350,00020%
Kentucky Chamber Advocacy Committee Inc$330,000225%
Affordable Housing Now See Schedule O for Full Name$300,00015%
Safe & Just Michigan$293,562121%
Center for American Progress Action Fund$251,85121%
Oklahomans for Criminal Justice Reform Action Inc$250,0001n/a
Forward Justice Action Network$250,000129%
Operation Restoration$250,0001n/a
Affordable Homes for San Franciscans Now$200,0001n/a
Casa Inc$200,00011%
Opportunity 2 Restore$180,0001100%
The Institute for Higher Education Policy$178,91027%
Community Service Society of New York$178,79611%
American Conservative Union Inc$178,2501n/a
Niskanen Center for Public Policy$175,000154%
Urban Habitat Program$150,00015%
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation$150,00014%
National Immigration Forum Action Fund$150,000112%
American Business Immigration Coalition Action$150,000175%
Conservatives For Criminal Justice Reform$147,000148%
Community Resources for Justice Inc$131,00010%
Bipartisan Policy Center Action Inc$125,00013%
The Education Trust Inc$125,00020%
America's Voice$125,00018%
The College and Community Fellowship Inc$109,89623%
R Street Institute$108,00011%
San Francisco Communities Against Displacement in Support of Prop A$100,000124%
Yes on 16 Opportunity for All Coalition$100,0001n/a
County of Alameda Ca$100,0001n/a
San Mateans for Affordable Housing$100,000186%
Utah Chamber$100,00012%
Faster Bay Area$100,00018%
Unite Oregon Action$100,000130%
Yes on Measure V$100,0001n/a
Casa in Action Inc$100,00018%
Justice and Accountability Center of Louisiana$75,000110%
Abundant Housing LA$75,00029%
Association of State Correctional A$62,00013%
Legal Action Center of the City of New York Inc$50,00011%
Vera Institute of Justice Inc$50,00010%
Neighbors for an Affordable San Jose$49,9991n/a
Colorado Center on Law and Policy$47,07213%
Mountain Association for Community Economic Development Inc$45,00011%
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc$37,50012%
Congregation Organized for a New Ct$30,00018%
Sutherland Institute$28,90011%

Where it is load-bearing

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 22 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 63 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFwdus Inc: $199,910,075 over 8y, 98% of budgetThe Just Trust for Action: $83,650,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNPH Action Fund: $11,566,200 over 4y, 98% of budgetSchools and Communities First: $10,788,510 over 3y, 17% of budgetTides Advocacy: $8,150,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCalifornia YIMBY: $3,345,412 over 4y, 58% of budgetCalifornians Against the Prison Spending Scam: $2,250,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetDrug Policy Action: $1,320,372 over 3y, 33% of budgetSilicon Valley Rising Action: $1,280,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetRise Up Inc: $1,150,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetAlliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action: $1,000,000 over 3y, 52% of budgetPICO California Action Fund: $850,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetSocial Good Advocacy Fund: $820,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetJustleadershipusa Inc: $799,999 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetForward Justice: $759,713 over 1y, 14% of budgetMillion Voters Project Action Fund for Schools and Communities First: $709,047 over 2y, 36% of budgetBay Area Housing Advocacy Coalition: $665,000 over 3y, 68% of budgetSv Home Action Fund: $550,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetMore Treatment for a Better Oregon Yes on 110: $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPurpose Dignity Action: $466,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPrison Fellowship Ministries: $440,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNorth Carolina Justice Center: $415,625 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky Inc: $365,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetYimby Action: $365,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetSafety and Justice Oregon: $360,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetVital Strategies Inc: $350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKentucky Chamber Advocacy Committee Inc: $330,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetAffordable Housing Now See Schedule O for Full Name: $300,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSafe & Just Michigan: $293,562 over 1y, 21% of budgetCenter for American Progress Action Fund: $251,851 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetForward Justice Action Network: $250,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetCasa Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOpportunity 2 Restore: $180,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetThe Institute for Higher Education Policy: $178,910 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCommunity Service Society of New York: $178,796 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNiskanen Center for Public Policy: $175,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetUrban Habitat Program: $150,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetLos Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetNational Immigration Forum Action Fund: $150,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAmerican Business Immigration Coalition Action: $150,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetConservatives For Criminal Justice Reform: $147,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetCommunity Resources for Justice Inc: $131,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBipartisan Policy Center Action Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAmerica's Voice: $125,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetThe College and Community Fellowship Inc: $109,896 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetR Street Institute: $108,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSan Francisco Communities Against Displacement in Support of Prop A: $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 63.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Open Society Action Fund IncNY32.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Open Society Action Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Fwdus Inc · Tides Advocacy · The Heising-Simons Action Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Just Trust for Action · Clean Slate Initiative Inc · Open Philanthropy Action Fund · The Just Trust for Education · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy with peer funders

About Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy

How much does Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy give?
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy reported 2 grants totaling $29,144,865 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 41 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Civil Rights (61%), Crime & Legal (30%), Housing & Shelter (4%).
Who are Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Fwdus Inc ($200M), The Just Trust for Action ($84M), NPH Action Fund ($12M).
Does Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Open Society Action Fund Inc, New Venture Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund.
Where is Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy based?
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Advocacy’s filings →

More from the funding graph