Skip to content

· Public charity

Chaim Lechag Inc

To provide food and other holiday necessities to single parent families that need financial aide and help to provide for the children so that these deprived children can experience the joy of the holiday seasons.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$2.5MHuman Services$427kPhilanthropy$350kInternational$283kScience & Tech$235kFood & Nutrition$235k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $1,121,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,538,678 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,417,578 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $958k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$282k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS DMIR$130,000
TOVA UVRUCHA$120,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA$115,000
CONGREGATION YAZOREY BOYAN$105,000
CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH ELYON$101,000
CONGREGATION OHR CHAIM$65,000
EZRAS ALTA FEIGA$61,800
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON$60,000
CONGREGATION YETAV LEV$50,000
YESHIVAS TORAS CHESED$50,000
CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZEDOKAH VCHESED$50,000
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$50,000
CONGREGATION MOSDOS SLONIM$40,000
KUPAS YALDEI JERUSALEM$38,000
KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL$33,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONGREGATION TIFERES INC: $150k → 14%KEREN OLAM HATORAH: $50k → 17%CONGREGATION YAD ELKA: $235k → 20%KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL: $150k → 11%CONGREGATION BAIS MEDRASH ELYON: $101k → 14%AGUDATH ISRAEL: $25k → 17%CONGREGATION YAD ELKA: $26k → 20%DARCHEI NOAM INC: $100k → 11%YESHIVAS TORAS CHESED: $50k → 14%TOVA UVRUCHA: $321k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON: $60k → 11%UNITED MOSDOS TORAH: $220k → 20%YAAZORU INC: $40k → 11%TOVA UVRUCHA: $290k → 20%KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL: $33k → 11%UNITED MOSDOS TORAH: $170k → 20%YAAZORU INC: $20k → 11%TOVA UVRUCHA: $220k → 20%CONGREGATION OHR CHAIM: $65k → 20%NETINA VECHINUCH: $150k → 20%CONGREAGION KNESSET SIMCHA: $40k → 20%TOVA UVRUCHA: $120k → 20%KUPAS YALDEI JERUSALEM: $38k → 20%TOVA UVRUCHA: $43k → 20%KOLLEL SHAREI TZION: $30k → 20%CONGREGATION CHASDEI EZREL YEHUDA: $20k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZEDOKAH VCHESED: $150k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAS DMIR: $130k → 20%AMERICANS FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA: $120k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA: $115k → 20%CONGREGATION YAZOREY BOYAN: $105k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZEDOKAH VCHESED: $50k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA: $45k → 20%CONGREGATION MOSDOS SLONIM: $40k → 20%IYUN HAPARSHAH: $139k → 20%TORAH VEYIRAH: $6k → 20%OHR SHLOMO: $50k → 20%CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE: $14k → 20%YAD RAFAEL FOUNDATION: $100k → 20%CONGREGATION YETAV LEV: $68k → 20%CONGREGATION YETAV LEV: $50k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $3.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$3.3M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO HELP NEEDY FAMILI

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 8 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$2.4M
$818k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

38%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $727k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionScience & TechInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    TOVA UVRUCHA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $993k
  • UM
    UNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $390k
  • YE
    YAD ELKA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $261k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • KM
    KEREN MARBE CHCHME
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TIFERES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • IH
    IYUN HAPARSHA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $139k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
6
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
7
Chesed Aharon
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Ner Aharon

The organization's primary activity is that of raising funds primarily for distribution to israeli institutions of higher learning. the funds may be distributed to other institutions organized exclusively for religious, charitable and…

Religion
10
American Friends of Zichron Yosef R

To provide relief funds

International
11
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ahavas Torah V'chesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOVA UVRUCHA INC: $993,163 · OtherTOVA UVRUCHA INCUNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INC: $390,000 · OtherUNITED MOSDOS TORAH VEYIRAH YERUSHOLYIM INCKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $183,000 · OtherKOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INCKEREN MARBE CHCHME: $150,000 · OtherKEREN MARBE CHCHMECONGREGATION TIFERES INC: $150,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES INCCONGREGATION YETEV LEV DSATMAR INC: $118,000 · OtherCONG YAZOREY OF BOYAN: $105,000 · OtherRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF YESHIVA AND KOLEL BAIS MEDRASH ELYON ASSN INC: $101,000 · OtherYAD RAFAEL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+12 more: $434,300 · Other+12 moreAHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $200,000 · PhilanthropyAHAVAS TO…DARCHEI NOAM INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyDARCHEI N…OHR SHLOIME INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyOHR SHLOI…YAD ELKA INC: $261,300 · Food & NutritionIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $139,300 · ReligionYAAZORU INC: $60,000 · ReligionYESHIVAS TORAS CHESED: $50,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA INC: $235,000 · Science & TechAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $130,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC: $60,000 · Education
Other$2,724,463Philanthropy$350,000Food & Nutrition$261,300Religion$249,300Science & Tech$235,000International$130,000Education$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAD ELKA INC: $261,300 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA INC: $235,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $139,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDARCHEI NOAM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetYAAZORU INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOHR SHLOIME INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAD ELKA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NECHAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED ↗
  • Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI NOAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC ↗
  • Who funds YAAZORU INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR SHLOIME INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS CHESED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON NAHUM ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY38× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Malchus Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Communal Fund · Yaazoru Inc · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Paamonim · The Strasbourg Foundation · J & R Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chaim Lechag Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaim Lechag Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chaim Lechag’s filings →

    More from the funding graph