· Public charity
Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc
The organization was formed to award financial grants and/or loans free of interest, to religious orthodox jewish organizations and individuals who are in distress and need financial relief.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 40 grants below total $3,732,717 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,097,291 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,364,574 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $429k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED RABBIS OF AMERICA | $581,671 |
| CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOISHE | $360,000 |
| AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED | $326,400 |
| CONG ACHDUT | $276,560 |
| BINYAN YERUSHLAIM | $225,000 |
| CHONEN VNOSEN | $204,820 |
| MERCAZ HATORAH VEHACHINCH | $189,844 |
| RBM CIRCLE | $175,000 |
| MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC | $157,050 |
| CONGREGATION KNESST SIMCHA | $125,000 |
| MERKAZ TORANI ORAITA INC | $102,075 |
| CONGREGATION KEREN SHIVIM | $100,000 |
| EZRAS YISROEL | $100,000 |
| ANENI WE ANSWER INC | $99,420 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC | $89,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $11M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $9.6M to organizations and $1.3M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE TO INDIGENTS · DONATIONS OF RELIGIOUS ARTICLES TO ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GOGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $803k · revenue +2%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC3× · 2022–2025 · $386k · revenue +35% · 25% of their budget
- YCYAD CHAYA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $247k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- KDKOLELL D CHASIDEI BELZone grant, 2023 · $2.0M
- CLCONGREGATION LEV SIMCHAone grant, 2023 · $400k
- GCGEMILOS CHASODIM CHASDEI MOSHE2× · 2019–2020 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education and religious activities and research
Religious Teaching
Support of religious schools in Israel
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
Promoting education by providing financial assistance and support services to educational organizations worldwide; to promote the jewish religion and jewish education through provision of educational programs, assisting the creation of…
Religious School
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yasis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Idf Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERCAZ TORANI ORAITA INC ↗
- Who funds ANENI WE ANSWER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
- Who funds MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY ↗
- Who funds YAD CHAYA INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
- Who funds Likras Shabbos Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Westlawn Foundation · American Friends of Rct Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Fishoff Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Beis Hachinuch Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.