Skip to content
Chaim Larachamin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Chaim Larachamin Foundation

$145k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Human Services$854kReligion$633kPublic Benefit$150kPhilanthropy$101kEducation$55kArts & Culture$15kCivil Rights$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$144,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$285
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETAILS OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS MADE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUEST$144,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIFERES YOSEF: $4k → 16%CONG SONS OF ISRAEL: $15k → 6%TIFERES MOSHE: $4k → 14%YESHIVA KOL ARYEH: $18k → 14%MIFAL EZRA ZICHRON YEHUDA: $4k → 20%CONG AHAVAS SHOLOM NADVARNEA: $5k → 15%MEOROS BAIS YAAKOV: $51k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $4k → 11%CONG BNEI MIFAL YOSEF: $5k → 14%KHAL MKOR CHAIM: $4k → 11%YESHIVAS VYELOPOL: $14k → 20%KEREN ORAH: $3k → 11%CONG CHASDEI AVOS: $6k → 20%EZER YESHIVA FOUNDATION: $4k → 20%BINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $72k → 20%HFPJC: $15k → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKA V'CHESED: $6k → 20%CONG ATZEI CHAIM SIGET: $5k → 20%NACHLAT YEHOSHUA: $5k → 20%AGUDAT REFUAH V'CHAIM: $5k → 20%CONG VISNITZ: $5k → 20%MOSDOT BOTASHOAN: $4k → 20%CONG AVREICHEN OF 21ST AVENUE: $4k → 20%CONG BOREI BESOMIN: $3k → 20%CONG DARKEI CHAIM: $3k → 20%GEMACH CHESED AVREICHEM: $3k → 20%CONG KHAL TORAS CHAIM: $3k → 20%YESHIVA TIFERES D'ALEKSANDER: $2k → 20%FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEYER: $2k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZDOKAH V'CHESED: $2k → 20%TORES CHEMED: $2k → 20%AHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $2k → 20%KEPAYIM: $2k → 20%KHAL CHASEDEI SKVARE: $2k → 20%NECHOMAS YISROEL: $2k → 20%SEE ATTACHED: $852k → 20%DETAILS OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS MADE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUEST: $145k → 20%JERUSALEM OPEN HOUSE: $41k → 20%CHONEN V'NOSEN: $13k → 20%CHAIM V'CHESED INC: $5k → 20%AVIR YAAKOV: $4k → 20%TOMER DEVORAH: $3k → 20%AGUDATH ISRAEL OF 18TH AVENUE: $2k → 20%CGPB: $5k → 20%CONG BAIS MENACHEM D'GLOGOV: $3k → 20%YESHIVA KEHILATH YAAKOV: $3k → 20%YESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $10k → 20%CONG CHAKAL YITZCHOK: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$134k · 3 repeat orgs$948k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
121

Total granted

$134k
$803k

Still filing today

0%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’22’23
EducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Franconia Foundation Inc.
    2× · 2020–2022 · $101k
  • CB
    Cong. Bais Menachem D'glogov
    2× · 2018–2020 · $17k
  • H
    HFPJC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $16k

Funded once

  • BY
    BINYAN YERUSHLAIM
    one grant, 2018 · $72k
  • KZ
    Kehal Zera Yitzchok Helmetz
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • JO
    Jerusalem Open House
    one grant, 2020 · $58k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS MADE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUEST: $144,800 · OtherDETAILS OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS MADE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION UPON REQUESTFranconia Foundation Inc.: $100,750 · OtherFranconia Foundation Inc.BINYAN YERUSHLAIM: $72,000 · OtherBINYAN YERUSHLAIMKehal Zera Yitzchok Helmetz: $70,000 · OtherKehal Zera Yitzchok HelmetzJerusalem Open House: $57,500 · OtherJerusalem Open HouseCong. Ahavas Tzdokah V'chesed: $55,600 · OtherCong. Ahavas Tzdokah V'chesedMifal Ezra Zichron Yehida: $49,200 · OtherJERUSALEM OPEN HOUSE: $40,500 · Other+113 more: $433,715 · Other+113 moreMEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $51,000 · EducationYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $4,000 · EducationAHAVAS TORAH V'CHESED: $1,800 · PhilanthropyCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,024,065Education$55,000Philanthropy$1,800Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $51,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…R' Shaya Ben Moshe Fo…The Strasbourg Founda…S&W Foundation IncAni Mamin FoundationZecher Avrohom IncHf FoundationYr FoundationM & M Fischer Foundat…Yeled V'Yalda Early C…B&M Steinmetz Foundat…
The Ojc FundNY44.4× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · The Strasbourg Foundation · S&W Foundation Inc · Ani Mamin Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Hf Foundation · Yr Foundation · M & M Fischer Foundation · Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc · B&M Steinmetz Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chaim Larachamin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaim Larachamin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chaim Larachamin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chaim Larachamin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chaim Larachamin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home