· Public charity
Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc
To provide children and families a network of educational, childcare, developmental services, health and physical fitness services, nutritional guidance, and family support.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $601k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mesamche Lev - Viyoel Moishe Inc | $108,000 |
| Mosdos Belz USA | $104,000 |
| Bais Shifra Inc | $63,000 |
| Mosdos Satmar BP Inc | $60,000 |
| Yaazoru Inc | $54,000 |
| Yeshiva Ketena of Bobov 45 Inc | $54,000 |
| Associated Beth Rivkah Schools | $54,000 |
| Yeshiva Machzikei Hadas | $54,000 |
| Congregation Yisroel Kedoshim | $54,000 |
| Educational Institute Oholei Torah of Brooklyn | $54,000 |
| Kollel D'Chasidei Belz | $54,000 |
| Regional Bikur Cholim | $54,000 |
| Congregation Our Layeshorim | $50,000 |
| Ani Ledodi Inc | $50,000 |
| Kollel Neizer Yisroel | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $647k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS3× · 2022–2025 · $129k · revenue +21%
- YIYAAZORU INC2× · 2024–2025 · $108k · revenue +811%
- TYTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $24k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CBCONGREGATION BAIS SHMIEL TZVIone grant, 2024 · $54k
- CPCONG PAER MESHULOM TASHone grant, 2024 · $54k
- BMBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICAone grant, 2024 · $54k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
To provide assistance to jewish religious schools
Rinas bais yaakov, inc was established for the charitable purpose of promoting jewish education and jewish identity.
To provide religious instruction & education to jewish children. to operate a religious school and all matters pertaining to the religious and secular aspects of operating a school.
To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Educational - operation of a parochial elementary school
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To help the indigent and other charitable institutions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chayim V Chesed and the most unlike its peers is Associated Beth Rivka School for Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Caroline & Joseph S Gruss Life Monument Funds Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc?
Find your warmest path to Yeled V'Yalda Early Childhood Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.