Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cereghino Joseph Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$193kReligion$189kHealth$142kHousing & Shelter$107kEmployment$64kYouth Development$49kEducation$30kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,540
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$7,630
FOUNDATION FOR THE JUNIOR BLIND$7,630
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SO CALIF$7,630
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES$7,630
CRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD OFFICES$7,630
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$7,630
THE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORP$7,630
FRED JORDAN MISSIONS$7,630
UNION RESCUE MISSION$7,630
THE MIDNIGHT MISSION$6,540
ST ANTHONYS GUILD$4,360
GRACE TO YOU$3,270
CITY OF HOPE$3,270
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC$3,270
FATHER FLANAGANS BOYS HOME$3,270
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $6k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $7k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $7k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$778k · 22 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$778k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+37%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles
    8× · 2018–2025 · $58k · revenue +35%
  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $58k · revenue +155%
  • THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CC
    CRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +37%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
5
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
10
American College of Lifestyle Medicine

Mission statement: advancing evidence-based lifestyle medicine to treat, reverse and prevent non-communicable, chronic disease. vision statement: a nation and world wherein lifestyle medicine is the foundation of health and all healthcare.…

Health
11
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
12
Beyond Us & Them

To offer programs and training that resource individuals and organizations in self-awareness, self-regulation, effective communication and to promote structures of belonging, utilizing council and other practices, to encourage social…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRED JORDAN MISSIONS: $57,575 · OtherFRED JORDAN MISSIONSGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SO CALIF: $57,575 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SO CALIFFOUNDATION FOR THE JUNIOR BLIND: $57,575 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE JUNIOR BLINDAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $49,455 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD OFFICES: $49,455 · OtherCRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD OFFICESTHE SALVATION ARMY: $35,980 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYST ANTHONY S GUILD: $32,900 · OtherST ANTHONY S GUILDUSC OFFICE OF GIFT PLANNING: $27,860 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $25,725 · OtherCARMEL OF MARIA REGINA: $24,675 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $24,675 · OtherFATHER FLANAGANS BOYS HOME: $24,675 · OtherCITY OF HOPE: $24,675 · OtherGRACE TO YOU: $24,675 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORP: $21,595 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $57,575 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian …UNION RESCUE MISSION: $57,575 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSIONTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $49,350 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSIONBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $18,615 · HealthCRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD: $8,120 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,120 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $29,715 · EducationORAL ROBERTS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $24,675 · ReligionCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,675 · InternationalMDRC: $6,060 · Employment
Other$539,070Human Services$164,500Health$34,855Education$29,715Religion$24,675International$24,675Employment$6,060

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $57,575 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $57,575 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $49,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $29,715 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $25,725 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetORAL ROBERTS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $24,675 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $24,675 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $18,615 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD: $8,120 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $6,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORAL ROBERTS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds CRIPPLED CHILDRENS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cereghino Joseph Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cereghino Joseph Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cereghino Joseph Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph